Patriot Power Hour #302 - Gold $3,500+; COVID Lab Leak Confirmed (DUH); Ration or Ruin Discussion

[00:00:00] You want a statement of purpose? Should I email you? Should I put this on your action item list? You decide your own level of involvement! We are the Prepper Broadcasting Network.

[00:01:21] Patriot Power Hour Live April 22nd, 2025. It's episode 302. Things keep on rolling. I'm Ben the Breaker Banksters here with Future Dan. What's going on Future Dan? Less than last time we met, although not including last night when we weren't talking about news, but last time we did a Patriot Power Hour,

[00:01:44] there's significant cooling. Well, I don't know. There's not a lot of news. About half of it is very hot. So only eight active headlines on the heat map dashboard. Don't want to steal that thunder. We'll do the blitzkrieg when we do the blitzkrieg on the dashboard, but some things are active and happening now or nearly so,

[00:02:09] but there's all kinds of indicators that just two, three, four weeks ago were heating up that have quieted back down. Absolutely blanked out. A little bit of whack-a-mole keeps it interesting each Patriot Power Hour. We try to weave together some trends and whether it's week to week, month to month, even year to year, but there is just so much disparate information out there that sometimes seems related, sometimes doesn't,

[00:02:39] that we focus on that week, just what's in front of us. So eight articles. We'll get to each one, and I think we'll have time to review all of them, but just because the frequency may not be as high as normal or at least the last couple of weeks, the severity is intense. And really the article I want to get into straight away or the topic, and it's a SHTF black or red on black gold 3500 plus.

[00:03:08] We've been watching this thing march up from 2000 to 3500 in seemingly just a few months. We'll go look at the actual chart in a little bit, but a hundred dollars night once in a while. Yes. It breaks through a hundred, hundred fifty bucks over a day or two, and then it retreats 30 bucks and it goes another hundred bucks and retreats 20 bucks and that steady march up and up. And you got to realize, yeah, going,

[00:03:36] it does going from $2,000 to $3,500. Doesn't seem absolutely incredible. It's okay. It's not even doubling, but that is hundreds of billions, actually really trillions of dollars of market capital. That's going right into gold. So trillions of dollars worldwide going away from bonds, which is debt instruments and government debt specifically,

[00:04:04] but a lot of corporate it's going into gold and it's going to Bitcoin to Bitcoin actually hit 94000 today up $9000 more than 10% just in the last week. And just today it was like three or four grand. So stock market not collapsing, not doing great, but golden gold and Bitcoin doing really nicely silver lagging a bit because it's industrial purposes,

[00:04:29] but also not doing bad at all. But man, 3500 gold. That is a big red flag to me. The paradox of gold on this show is the paradox of course, if you own it or you believe in it, it going up is ostensibly a good thing. Meanwhile, it's on the future danger heat map because it is one of many indicators of danger when it's spiking

[00:04:57] to all time highs in this day and age. It does mean there's problems in the fiat system, but we don't have headlines for them right now. So what, what gives that? Well, if there's truly a liquidity crisis or the absolute blow up of the carry trade or other,

[00:05:19] I won't get technical and wonky, but other, uh, Lehman brothers or bear Stearns type problems brewing in the system, they will do everything possible to keep a lid on that partially because it would become a self-fulfilling prophecy. Like they might have a chance to save the financial system, but if everyone knows it's on the precipice, it's definitely going down. So, but also from national security standpoint, like even Trump would want to try to cover that up,

[00:05:46] let alone prior administrations. So I think that could be part of it, but gold cannot be suppressed anymore. And the jump from 3000 to 3500 was so fast. Like the, it's been marching somewhat steadily, uh, from 2000 up to 3500. But once it crossed three grand, it really, after it crossed 2,500, the old all time high, it's been going at a record pace or damn near record pace.

[00:06:15] But that said, some folks might remember gold going gangbusters three or four decades ago and gold's on that current pace. And if it does that, they say gold could be seven or $8,000 by the midterms. Then that was a high of $800 in the early, early 1980s. But where did it start though? I think I forgot it was like 150 bucks or less.

[00:06:41] I think it also touched below 200 again for a decade after that's true. Very true. I don't think that'll happen again, though. I don't think that the, uh, the bankster systems would be able to re inflate this bubble for another couple of decades. Like they did in the eighties nineties, two thousands, you know? So, Hey, I think they can still re inflate it at least one more time. So I'm not saying go all in on gold or Bitcoin right now.

[00:07:09] There could be some crash that could bring gold back down to 2,500 or 2000 and definitely load up then. But on the other hand, I'm happy I got some. So I'm going to run through some inactive future danger economic head indicators. Ones that don't have any news, don't have any headlines or no evidence of them right now.

[00:07:32] I'm going to run through these and ask you if you think in the back ground secretly perhaps, or just hasn't just, just hadn't shown up yet in a way that we can, you know, attach to which, which of these economic indicators do you expect to see activated? Uh, let's say before labor day. How's that? All right, let's do it. Stock market crashes.

[00:08:03] We'd have to define that. I've said in the past though, the Dow Jones below 35 K would be a mini crash nearly there. I'm talking about a top 10 daily percent decline, a crash, a 1929 October, March, 2020. I think it was a September or October of 2008 or seven.

[00:08:30] You know, one of those crashes, one of those top 10 one day crashes. What you see that happening between now and September? Not particularly likely on one or two days, but I could see another 20 plus percent of the market will drop in the next few months. Cumulatively. That might be healthy though. It's the crash. Maybe. How about a beer, the fear gauge rising further?

[00:08:57] It fixed the fear gauge volatility index has sat at above 30 since just two weeks ago when we had a market panic, right? The meltdown upon receiving then, you know, the, the liberation day tariffs, but the fear gauge it's higher than usual, but it's not rising right now. You anticipate, see that thing spiking again, but between now and labor day.

[00:09:23] Maybe a good way to look at it is will it make a new high for the year because in the last couple of weeks, it has fluctuated very highly into the thirties and forties. So would it get up to the fifties or higher, which is really panic? Well, we hit 60 something just, uh, the other day had a day of that. We could, should go look at the chart. It didn't close at that, but it was in there. It tapped it. Kind of. It did. It did. It was. Yeah.

[00:09:48] They're in the meltdown when the, when the stock market began to look like it was crashing just a week or so ago. I think it would, it could easily do that again, but actually exceeding that not super likely. Yeah. Cause I feel like if it gets too nasty, Trump will ease off a little bit temporarily off the, uh, you know, rhetoric or he's playing a really interested, uh, negotiation game and he can turn it on and turn it off a bit.

[00:10:16] I think NBC guy said that the difference between 1929 and now is it can be stopped or mitigated. Whereas in 1929, it was just, everything was collapsed and there was nothing really anyone could do at that point. Now. Yeah. So I think, uh, could be choppy and still go down another 20% equal to what we've seen another day or two of that, but not just not in a disorderly manner. You're not.

[00:10:44] It's like China attacks Taiwan or their blockades. It literally stops all trade in the South China sea. That's a different thing or some other black Swan. I think that in of itself is at least a 5% chance between here and Labor Day, a black Swan event that would cause a major crash. Like we're talking about top 10 crash, but not because of just because of economic news, something else. Black Swan event.

[00:11:09] It's just something that money over focus people call an event that they chose to ignore the possibility of it's a military players. Don't call the potential invasion of Taiwan, a black Swan event. That's just on the books as an operations plan or a whole series of them. And it has been for decades. Yeah, that's their job and that's their model. That's the model they're working in.

[00:11:36] Economists and finance people don't look at war as being part of their model for better or worse. I think that's a tortured term, right? The whole idea of a black Swan is something that's, you know, genetically should never happen, but did. What's the right word? Is it extraneous or outside of the model? Externality of the model. Yeah. Yeah. Some other force from outside the model influences it. Yeah.

[00:12:03] Such as nukes going off a dirty bomb, a blockade of Taiwan. COVID 2025. Yeah. So any of those, I think there's a, that's why I'm a prepper. That's why I wear a prepper broadcasting network is that anytime I think I, that things like that could happen, you have said that it's less likely now because they don't want to give Trump that power to respond. Maybe, maybe not. I don't know, but I'm not, I'm not sure there's the they out there. That's a coherent.

[00:12:32] They, there's, there's all kinds of power centers on all kinds of dimensions, all striving right now. There's no, there's no great boogeyman. They, and that I, I perceive way less organized than they used to be for sure. Um, anyway, don't we've already hit a lot of good topics, but before we pivot to the news, but anything else you want to say on gold on. Oh, let me do a few more indicators. And these have been recently activated. So I'm reading from the top. That's the way the future danger works.

[00:13:03] Our indicators that had news that have news rise to the top and they are, you know, run, run their course. And they, you know, eventually the, the, the heat map engine purges those headlines. And the, and then the, the indicators go deactive. They turn blue. There's no headline there. That's not actively happening, but they sink down, but they, they stay at towards the top among the blues.

[00:13:31] So if you actually scroll to the very, very, very, very bottom of future danger, you, you get down into, uh, potential indicators that have never been activated. Like private school being outlawed. Right.

[00:13:45] I mean, it's a, it's a, it's, it's one of those things that went into the development of future danger, you know, listening to alternative media for the first time, listening to many, many sources, but you know, a perfect example would be Alex Jones and the types of things that were said, like this could happen and that could happen. Well, a future danger, if you get towards the bottom, that's a bunch of that's those potential things that, you know, logic says it could happen.

[00:14:14] There hasn't been any indication of it in, in the history of future danger, which is, uh, this October 10 years old. Uh, but the stuff that I'm about to read to you, Ben at the top, it's been recently active. Um, inflation skyrocketing this summer. Let's give you inflation skyrocketing this summer, unemployment exploding this summer and the real estate market melting this summer. They're not active. Now we don't have news of that right now.

[00:14:45] No, it's there both the fed and the administration are straddling the line between unemployment and inflation, trying to hold both kind of at a decent level. Growth isn't horrible and inflation isn't horrible. And that's way better than alternatives that face them.

[00:15:07] So I, I think it's more of the unemployment and asset crash and lower, just lower standard of living. Generally, that's more likely than huge inflation in the near term. But I do expect the U S dollar to continue to give away its reserves currency status. Even if Trump tries to do anything within the next 10 years, it's going to get worse and worse.

[00:15:35] So that will absolutely cause big inflation, hyperinflation damn near in the next decade, but maybe not in the next few months between labor day, between now and labor day. You want us to guess through the heat map dashboard. Just take us from through all the articles. Now, now a good time. Might as well. Let's do it. Go for it, man. All right. Third column is where we'll start.

[00:16:04] So we were already talking about economics, gold sores, gold spikes above 3373. Let's go look exactly where it is tonight. Yep. 3345. It was down 75 bucks today, but that's only cause last night it hit above 3500. So we'll dive a little bit more into some gold calculations and some other numbers down the line. Why does it matter?

[00:16:31] Well, if you're a prepper, better, better get prepping. If you're not already dollars losing value. And here's another article dollar role as a de facto global reserve currency looking increasingly uncertain. Doesn't mean you as an American or, you know, your family have to lose everything. There's ways to prep, but, uh, the U S dollar, as you know, it may be heading to a bad ending soon.

[00:17:01] Not much. Like you said, though, nothing else economically in terms of news articles, but that gold is a huge article. How about this lab leak? White house unveils massive report on the true origin of COVID-19 lab leak. Absolutely confirmed under labs, lose control of pathogens. We'll go review that in great detail. Going back the last five or six years on that indicator after the news blitz.

[00:17:29] Cause this is the capstone article of dozens and dozens of articles that have shown and proven this to be true. But Hey, the white house.gov posted, I guess that means it's real now. Technology suppression exposed. There's a claim that suppressed zero point energy and anti-gravity technologies concealed by the shadow government.

[00:17:55] Director of white house office of science and technology policy says that the U S has the ability to manipulate space and time with new technology had some other interesting quotes. We will absolutely get into some of the suppressed or allegedly suppressed technology, whether it's weaponry space assets, healthcare, all a lot of interesting technology that hoping Trump and friends will release to the public.

[00:18:26] Let's go ahead.

[00:19:05] Let's go ahead.

[00:19:29] Let's go ahead.

[00:19:57] Back over the history of the 20th century. You could probably guess to say that, you know, that technology was militarily operational in order to end the cold war. The morale of the Soviet high regime may have just come apart. The seams once it was demonstrated to them.

[00:20:23] This is, this is an indicator that doesn't typically get activated. Can you click into it? See if in the archive, if anything is showing up here. Technology suppression exposed. Let's take a look. Nothing. Yeah. This is the first time ever. First time ever. First time ever.

[00:20:45] We've had a headline that broached the subject in a coherent enough way by someone with, you know, not, not to fall prey to argument by authority. But when a person employed by the White House or previously employed by the White House starts to say these things, that's harder, harder to ignore. Right. Yes. It's not just on my website to throw the banksters.com or a Hollywood movie at one point. Right.

[00:21:15] Yes. Predicted programming of a Hollywood movie plot to make some goofy Randy Quaid character be the one saying it so that no one believes it later. Well, we've talked about this on the show a couple of times where we, when we first came to PBN, we promised the intrepid commander, James Walton, that we would not be conspiratorial. Talk about Bigfoot or Loch Ness Monster or aliens.

[00:21:43] Not that we do anyway, but we're like, he knew we didn't, but we had a little conversation about that. But as you said, this is no longer in that realm. Not that it really was hidden technologies certainly out there. But like you said, this is bubbling to the surface and a lot more, I guess, an official manner. Like it's a part of the official government records now, public facing at least.

[00:22:11] I don't see any evidence that it's alien technology. But those Tic Tac videos we've talked about before on the show, there have been videos of purported extraterrestrial craft that immediately when I saw them, I thought to myself, or that's our technology. And this is a demonstration of force.

[00:22:35] And it's putting it out there in the public sphere at the, you know, the, the, the common public level meant to wonder if it's an off world civilization with technology. We can't comprehend, you know, blah, blah, blah, ancient aliens and all those shows, you know, speaking from that side.

[00:22:58] Or did we figure it out, you know, figuring out how to detonate a, you know, nuclear weapon in 1945 is, or, or land on the moon. You know, there's going to be people that say those are all false and, you know, all, all, all part of a conspiracy. But we've made major technological achievements arriving at something that, you know, harnesses, you know, anti-gravity power.

[00:23:28] Maybe we, maybe we pulled it off and maybe all of those videos and all of those TV shows and all those movies is just the cover story. But our, our, our, our, our near peer opponents, Moscow, Beijing, they would have been told they would have been shown they would have, they would have known what time it is. So, right. You know, if this is going on, then there, and the idea of world war three starting seems pretty naive.

[00:23:59] You can't start a thermonuclear war with a country that could deliver that sort of payload anywhere, anytime, instantly. And that's a lot of, at least from a weapon standpoint, what I've, the conspiracies that I've researched with regard to this is that they can send, pretty much send a nuclear weapon energy and x-rays anywhere on the planet, even miles underground.

[00:24:27] So, they're able to use quantum mechanics to somehow send an explosion anywhere. And so, there's no way you can hide from it. So, you don't even need nukes. You can use this, like, energy transporter destruction device. I don't know. But I do know they have a lot of secret space stuff going on out there.

[00:24:48] They even admit, hey, yeah, you know, there's certain satellites up there that you can see that are just, you know, they're NRO or they are military. And they're pretty dang big. And that's just what we know. Am I saying they have a secret lunar base on Mars or on the moon or a base on Mars? I have no idea. I don't think the Earth is flat. And I bet we've been to the moon since 1974. But, I don't know.

[00:25:17] It's a slippery slope, something that's very interesting and I would love to talk about all day. But, this is coming. I'm looking forward to what comes out next. Not just on this, but 9-11 and the COVID lab leak. You know, more information, the better. I want the truth to come out. This is a powerful psyop because of all the dimensions that fractures to. All the things that people can believe.

[00:25:42] All the things they heard and mutated from movie plots or misremembered because I saw it in a comic book. And, you know, it just goes in so many directions so fast. But, I think you can believe that there are air platforms that have harnessed anti-gravity mechanisms and can move at speeds. Not with people on them because it would, you know, just absolutely kill the people at those speeds.

[00:26:12] But, large vehicles that can move very fast or almost instantaneously around the planet. That can carry weapons payloads that, you know, previously, you know, you had to worry about whether you could deliver them. And, not for a moment have to believe that there is such thing as E.T.

[00:26:36] Well, the Nazis came up with almost the technology for the NASA space program. Some say they had some of this anti-grav technology too. They had the best, at least some of the best scientists of the first half of the 20th century. And, we kind of took them over and added some American ingenuity. Raced against the Soviets. And, pretty sure, yeah.

[00:27:06] Space is what really grinds my gears because I know there's a lot of stuff going up there. And, I really want to know what they're doing up there. But, that is the real frontier of warfare and surveillance. And, of course, Starlink is not just for your internet communication. Let's just say that. Talked about the Golden Dome and increased missile defense. And, yeah, that's where it's all going down. They're in cyberspace. Space and cyberspace future, Dan. Anything else you want to hit on this? Go ahead. Yeah.

[00:27:36] If these weapons exist, there is no missile defense. The missile defense you would build would be for what used to be a third world country that can now deliver 1950s technology. This doesn't have anything to stop it. Right? So, everybody is perfectly at risk who has this technology. So, if China has it and Russia, maybe Russia doesn't have it.

[00:28:00] Maybe that's why we get so on the bloody fringe of having NATO forces in contact with Russian troops is because all the power centers in Western Europe already know we got this technology. Third world war is unthinkable. Third world war is unthinkable. It would be over in an instant. Right? Right? And we're not going to do that to Russia when they don't match us up. Right?

[00:28:29] And Russia might very well have had that. You know, Soviets might have had that put right into their face. Right? Right. Late 80s. Hey, stop. We got this. You don't have this. This is the end of your empire. I think this century, we'll be lucky if we get disclosures like this. Those black programs, those special access programs, they're well engineered to keep secrets. Oh, yeah.

[00:28:59] They're pretty dang good at it. All right. Well, 9-11. Go ahead. 9-11. 9-11. Because some say some directed energy weapons were used in 9-11. What's your thoughts on digging up? You know, the 9-11 was inside jobs. We just let it lie. It's been 24 years.

[00:29:26] Or are you as stoked as I am for Senator Ron Johnson? I really hope he digs into this publicly. Well, it's like Kennedy and his assassination. If you delay enough decades, enough people will die. And you'll never get to the full truth. So that means there's at least another 50 years until 9-11 actually comes out.

[00:29:54] I'm hopeful that they make it happen a little faster, meaning in the next year or two. But I'm not holding my breath, to be honest. But nobody in power now was in power when Kennedy was shot. Right. The point where nobody in power was in power or even alive when 9-11 happened. So. That's how far we got to get until it. So that means we'd have another 50 years until that happens. And I don't want that.

[00:30:24] I will leave you when it happened. I was like 16 or 17, maybe. Yeah. And are there, I guess there's people that were 16 or 17 when Kennedy was shot. We still have, we still can't get to the bottom of it. Right. Exactly. So that, I do not want that to happen with 9-11. Like it's already been 20 plus years. Let's make it happen now. Do you think that will happen or you're saying it'll, this is BS essentially. This is for show. I'm not saying either of those things.

[00:30:55] I'm saying it's going to be really hard to bring this out because the only plausible explanation that was a intelligence operation and Al Qaeda really thought they were taking down those buildings in real airplanes. And ultimately they were wind up dolls. They were assets. They were manipulated by who, right? I don't, I'm not sure we'll get to the bottom of that.

[00:31:22] Now, again, these intelligence programs are well engineered to limit who knew what. I'm not sure we'll get to the bottom of Butler, Pennsylvania. That's a good one. I mean, that's, that's a cold, seems like a really cold trail right now too. Right. So the lesson learned here is, you know, these, these forms of espionage.

[00:31:45] They can be practiced in the modern age and they could be accused in the modern age and they can go without enough proof for anybody alive. When they happened to, you know, without the majority of people alive, when it happened to ultimately believe it or believe it in time for it to make any difference. Right.

[00:32:10] The way I look at it is the bad things and the technology is quickening so much. Maybe it took 60 years for JFK, 20 years for 9-11. We need to make COVID happen in five years or less. The next trick they pull, we need to happen, you know, the truth to come out right away or within a year. Those people aren't going to believe their BS anymore. That's what I'm looking to see.

[00:32:34] So seeing this lab leak, COVID-19, seeing 9-11 being questioned, seeing potentially suppressed energy. And don't forget medicine and all types of agriculture and everything being suppressed. So all that being discussed compared to 10 years ago. I'm not going to forget nothing that I've never seen any reasonable proof of.

[00:33:01] This is a close, again, this is the first time we ever got a headline. Oh, well, well, that's where I'm going on. I know you're very strict. That's fine. That's great. With following the actual evidence, I believe where there's smoke, there's fire. I'm looking 10, 20, 30 years ahead. We're already called 9-11 as BS 15 years ago. I called COVID as BS immediately. So what is BS now? Now, what am I calling that has no evidence that's BS, but 10, 20 years, it'll be obvious.

[00:33:28] I need to call that out now, even if it's maybe taken a bridge too far. I'm speculating, certainly. Well, among types of conspiracy theories, the bioweapon out of China and the Al Qaeda attack in New York and Washington that has signs that it was manipulated by controllers, right? Those aren't the same as technology suppression. Those are events, right?

[00:33:58] And you're right. There is kind of this quickening where these kind of major faith-shaking, terrible events seem to be coming more frequent. But tech suppression, I mean, I can imagine the right scenario where as a patriot, I would have absolutely supported my government suppressing the technology. And that's where I say, in theory, I would be a socialist.

[00:34:24] It sounds so great in theory, but we know in practice, socialism is the devil. Trusting your government to suppress technology is the road to hell in my book. I don't know. We've got a military advantage, and it's only advantageous if you keep it secret. What defense policy in the history of humankind wouldn't have had the most serious, smartest

[00:34:53] commanders of the military working as hard as they can to keep it secret because it conveys an advantage? It's just militarily logical. Yeah. Yeah. Well, that's the competing forces. I'm on the opposite force of that. I can see where a patriot may want its government to have better stuff than other governments for sure. But even the Trump government, I don't trust, let alone the past five administrations. Trust what?

[00:35:24] To hang on to a technology that prevents World War III? To farm trillions of dollars off the industrial military complex and poison the population at the same time? Well, let's just focus on the, you know, a suppressed technology. Okay. I don't know if that suppressed technology, if it's an anti-Gravatic weapon system that, you know, payload delivery system that we've had and others haven't had.

[00:35:50] And it's kept a balance of nuclear power. It's kept Pax Americana for decades if it exists. And had it been exposed and made known worldwide for some part about it, there's a lot of stuff. Drone technology is like this. If you disclose you have drones of a certain type, you know, make them a public program. You can't keep them as secret. And then eventually countermeasures emerge. Right.

[00:36:22] And in many military deception operations, it's essential. You know, for it to work, you got to be quiet about it. Not a lot of people can know. This is inherent to warfare. And warfare is inherent to the human condition. The best thing, if it, if it takes keeping a secret to not be in a world war, I'm for it. Yeah.

[00:36:46] That, you know, for the very specific weapon platform and schematics and know-how and engineering. Sure. But there's so much other applications of that technology being hidden that that's pretty tough. It's a tough battle. I'm not sure about the zero point energy. The Tesla coil that was seized so that the petroleum industry could go on for centuries making money.

[00:37:13] That never, that never passed the SNFDAT test to me for militarily logical. Well, as you said, it's very easy to either purposefully or on accident kind of be a charlatan and say, oh, all this stuff is fake. And then, of course, they have a cure for cancer and just say all these things because sci-fi happens in sci-fi. So, of course, they have it now. So, I try not to let that take over too much.

[00:37:38] But also, when I'm looking straight at the lab leak, straight at question 9-11, straight at gold going high, so the entire economic scheme falling apart, I'm like, huh. You know, I don't know if I can trust these governments anymore. But like you said, if it prevents World War III having that overmatch, I'm a fan of that.

[00:38:00] What if it's a program that the president and two advisors in the White House and the Secretary of Defense and one aide that he has and the Chairman of the Joint Chief and a commander in the Air Force? Like even skipping the Secretary of the Air Force and the Air Force top general. Like there's eight people that know all about it.

[00:38:26] And then underneath the commander in the Air Force that has this technology, he's got a program split into 20 different pieces with anywhere from two to 200 people all focused on one little part of it. And the integration of it is, you know, that's how it's done. That kind of compartmentalization. You can build these things. You can have them. And that few people can actually know. I think history's going to show that.

[00:38:54] I think history might show right now that there was weapon systems that we've had control of that's kept the peace my entire lifetime and your entire lifetime. I'll be interested to see if AI can tease any of this out when they come up with smarter, stronger, faster AI systems that can parse all of the contents of human history within seconds.

[00:39:19] If they'll be able to find loose ends of contracts with, you know, public contracts with contractors and bills and all this stuff that somehow they can infer that. Yeah, there was, you know, one point two trillion dollars put into the space platform that was launched in 1985 or, you know, that's part of the black budget. We can't say what it was for, but there's proof that it's not built that way.

[00:39:44] Almost there's proof that there's no proof there, that there's a hole, there's a gap in the data almost. I give you a proof that a properly run SAP or STO doesn't leave information in a way that the only way you could do that is to install the same AI in every physically separated skip. These are buildings that are built to not be spied inside of all the computer systems inside of them are absolutely isolated.

[00:40:14] Maybe, you know, they do have, you know, J-Wix and other classified networks, but in the highly, highly, you know, protected SAPs and STOs, you get the best AI that you want. You'll never be able to cobble together the whole picture, just like any good intelligence operation, right? Why did Ruby kill Oswald?

[00:40:34] And then he died in prison from cancer later and poof, you're never going to know because it's, it's all, it cannot be known. Butler too. Yeah. Yeah. Why was that guy cremated within days? Where's Yurik? We had that headline last summer. Right.

[00:40:55] Cat looking like the dead body that we got a picture of with a big jawline that did not look like the accused shooter, you know, hours later. Where's that Yurik? I haven't seen any alternative media try to figure out whether that guy's alive still. All right. Anything else you want to hit on for the news blitz? Otherwise, maybe we could take a few minutes of ration a room. We don't have to go too deep into it because people can go listen to the full shebang.

[00:41:25] It was released earlier today. Well, I was just mentioning again, Boston mayor linked to Chinese intelligence. That's pretty, that's not even a conspiracy anymore. The Chinese party definitely, the Chinese Communist Party definitely made it an objective to control one of our political parties and those fools let it happen.

[00:41:46] You know, it drives me crazy is when the left, the so-called left talks about all the billionaire funding and big funding for the far right.

[00:42:03] I'm like, number one, the Democrats biggest funder was the U.S. government until USAID was cut off, had its throat slit metaphorically and billions of dollars going to left, leftist and let's just call it internationalist organizations. Totally cut off. That's billions and billions of dollars.

[00:42:28] And then the actual number of real billionaires that donate to the left, that's a lot, as much or more than the right. But then you had China. They are absolutely on the left side with regard to funding, with regard to sabotage, espionage. So it makes me almost laugh, but it's more pathetic.

[00:42:55] So I don't actually laugh when I hear leftists say the right gets all the big money. I'm like, you guys had all the money from the freaking U.S. government taxpayer. Number one. And you get all your money from China and internationalists and banksters, man. Give me a freaking break. Yeah. Most people supporting that party would have lost train of thought halfway through that sentence. So, yeah, no, I know. I don't even try. If people haven't woken up by now, it's pretty hard for me to do it.

[00:43:24] But, uh, but yes, you get money from government. You get money from China. That's bad. They can't understand that. I don't think we'll just say. Musk is billionaires taking over our democracy. Dirt. Do you know what Xi's degree is in? I know his daughter went to Harvard, but no, I don't know what Xi Jinping, what is his degree in? Marxism. Nice. Yeah.

[00:43:55] Doctorate in Marxism. He understands it well. He understands how to spread it internationally, especially to the Democrat mayor of Boston. Probably better than all the rest of them.