Patriot Power Hour #351 - Season Finale & Mid-Year Prediction Recap

Yeah, you said, I put this on your action item list. Would you decide your own love love involvement. We are the Proper Broadcasting Network. You are now listening to the Patriot Power Hour, the newest show of the Prepper Broadcasting Network. This live episode features the situational awareness you need to practice self reliance and independence. Introducing your hosts, Ben the Breaker of Banksters and Future Dan, the editor of Future Danger dot com. Episode three hundred and fifty one of Patriot Power Patriot Power Hour is here. It's June tenth, twenty twenty six. I've been the Breaker of Banksters here with Future Dan and Future Dan. This is the season finale. Which makes it a special which is why we're showing a dashboard, very unique and new and experimental dashboard on our video cast. Tell us what we got, Ben, Well, longtime listeners might remember that here at the Patriot Power Hour on Prepper Broadcasting Network, we've made it a bit of a tradition, be of a uh, you know, end of year and mid year predictions and check ins. So our first episode in January, I believe it was episode three three one in today's three five one. Let me go double check that. But about twenty episodes ago was you know, early January twenty twenty six. We spent an entire episode laying out potential scenarios for twenty twenty six that every prepper needs to be aware of and and you know, really tracking and our percentage chance of will it happen? Is it highly likely or is it very low chance? Hey, maybe it's still prepping worth prepping for, but you know, maybe not, it's maybe it's overblown. Our story is short. This is the dashboard as of today, June tenth, twenty twenty six. We got a lot to go through on a future Dan, but it's really really interesting, maybe our most interesting dashboard of all time. Yeah, we got a lot of hits, and we did do forgetting predictions for twenty twenty six on January first. It is the only time we've ever broadcast on the first of the year. So look back to the the archives and you'll find us one and artificial intelligence to try to take the transcript of that show and make sure all the numbers of confidence levels are correct. Yere and maybe there, but we dance some validations. We think we got this mostly right. So it's a good baseline to talk from. Actually the Prediction show on the first of the year. Is our actual st is and when we wrap up this year at the end of the h it looks great. We had a little bit of tactical difficulties. You came in at the very last second. Hope your rubber band in probably the network, but I got most of what you said. I think it looks pretty good. Hey, I'm gonna make it look really shine for the end of year dashboard. But this gets what we needed. And now, of course, a lot of people are listening on radio podcasts, live and archives, so they don't see what we got displayed here. But for those on Rumble, be sure to follow Prepper Broadcast Network. On Rumble you can see the screen we're sharing. And we got twenty different indicators future DAN and they're color coded both based on the column they're in the category and midyear takeaways slash. Did it happen or not? Was it a hit or is it a total miss? Or something in between. That's what we're looking at here. Yeah, how's my audio coming in now? Better? Very good? All right, let's take it from maybe top from the top and the left on through. Walk us through where we're how we're doing ben all right. The first one we put down, thrown down the gauntlet for twenty twenty six prediction back in January, will the US have a recession in twenty twenty six to straight quarters negative growth or more? We said only a twelve point five percent chance of that, a one and eight chance, and I believe in you know where we're standing right now, does not seem very likely. And are you know AI large learning, A large language model that we run this through says that we're very unlikely that we're gonna miss this one. It's given us a hit future. Dan, I don't know, Q three, Q four could be a double recession, but but it doesn't think so. It thinks we're gonna be good Q one and Q two and maybe even Q three from what I'm seeing. Yeah, if we're using the traditional measure of a recession to negative growth figures of GDP in two consecutive quarters, and I'm taking a percentage you know, down to less than one percent right now. That seems to be what the our informal Greater AI system says, Yeah, very low probability that the US will hit a recession in twenty twenty six. And we put twelve point five percent, which is pretty low in hindsight. We probably should even put lower, or we could have put big time money on this if you think it from kind of the odds, because the overall consensus was, I would expect higher than twelve point five. So we took a sort of low conservative, non hype stance and it prevails as it seems. Yeah, let's work through this. Number two FED cuts below two point five percent. We may have been much too high on that. And it's also because later we're going to see we did not anticipate epic fury. No, and so therefore that the FED was not thought a reserve not able to cut rates below two point five percent. We put it as a little bit higher than a coin flip. Fifty five percent chance the FED would cut rates below two point five percent. Well, they haven't been able to cut, like you said, even close to that at this point. So the grade is, well, it's an orange, which means not likely for this to take place. We did say it was only like a coin flip, are a little bit more, but as you said, with epic fury, that put water on that for sure. Yeah, we were high on that. US det ex seeds forty trillion. That's a yellow I don't know the trajectory of that. Maybe the deck clocks available from your monitor. How we doing actually on that? I should I don't want to break anything to get off this screen and look all right at this second. But uh, the forty trillion, we said a sixty six point seven. You know, I'll try to make it a happen on the other end. Hopefully I don't disconnect or anything. But you know, we said the two had of three chance it would be greater than forty. Right now, it's at thirty nine point two three trillion. Yeah, and you know, let's take seven hundred and sixty five billion away. I guess how long does it take for us to rack up that much? I think, uh, you know we're gonna hit it at Wow. We might. Yeah, that's gonna be a close one. At the end of the year. Number four, Gorument's shut down for grade in ten days and so we said it was eighty five percent. But then there's only a partial shutdown for a big stretch. So how do you know how much of a government shutdown happened? Isn't really addressed in what we talked about. I think we're we were talking about the the full shutdown of the federal civilian agencies. Of course, the Intelligence Agency and the Department of War never stop. Big parts of DHS never stop. But I don't I don't think we've had that greater than ten day. I don't think we get a hit on that yet. But I'm still sticking with eighty five that we could easily see that with with even in a lame duck Congress, you know, they could they could do things that shut stuff down. So our analysis returned an asterisk next to this one. It said partial government shutdown scoring needs better definition and to be discussed on air. It literally prompted us that, Hey, it's really hard for me to score this right now. You need to define what a government shutdown is. And that's exactly what you just said. So you could speak further about it, because we're gonna ingest we're gonna upload the transcript of this show into this chat later. So what would you'd like to say in that regard? It all depends on how where the money's blowing and who has temporary amounts of money, but a lot of the government is funded out. We might actually miss that one. Well, we'll see, we'll see. We needed to find these types of things better before we put them out on air. But that's okay, amateur radio as fine as number five top ten bank failure or forced merger set a twenty five percent chance. I haven't seen any news to that effect yet, but I think that's one of those things where there's always at least a twenty five percent chance of that with modern monetary theory. One hundred percent on that twenty five percent, I do say so. I feel like if that occurs, it's very likely. We'll also hit on that FED cuts blow two point five percent, for example. And we talked about some of those potential interdependencies and correlation, negative correlation, all that stuff on previous episodes. Don't dive into it too much here, but I agree several of these indicators could flip literally in just a few days, but others need a bigger build up, and you can trend to them out a little easier. So precious metals six and seven already achieved them, already happened, and in fact makes our prependage estimates low look low. Now, man, it's been insane in the last six months. Really, I guess five full months. Wow, unbelievable. Really, Silver easily clear one hundred dollars, but it's round tripped back to like sixty five bucks right now as we stand today, Gold above five thousand dollars. We hit that. We knocked both of those out of the park in the first couple of months. Gold well above five k, but it also has pulled back to gosh, I think like forty three hundred earlier today, or it's been they've been so volatile, they've been trading like a crypto future. Dan. We got one hit under bit gooing number nine, not to kind of hit you and I'm kind wanted as bitcoin owners, but we were correct at, you know, at at a fifty chance it went under seventy. Yeah, I see two numbers. I got to go review the exact transcript. It didn't translate as well on this dashboard, but we got two numbers, and I bet my guess is I said there's a fifty percent chance goes below seventy k, and the other numbers eighty five percent. And it makes sense maybe you said eighty five percent chance bitcoin goes below seventy k, and it's certainly under there. It's sixty five k. Right now. That's my guess. I'll go check those facts and we'll obviously talk about this prediction in December as well when we do the end of your cap. But I you knocked that out of the park. Feature, Dan, I was on the low side, and I do think the bitcoin will see it's two hundred thousand dollars day, but I'd probably lower that percentage chance that happens this year the way way things are sitting. Yeah, we had a thirty percent chance bitcoin hit above two hundred k, and you can remember it was above one hundred and gosh, I don't know what it was on January first, should go go take a look, but it was definitely above a hunter k, maybe hundred and ten. Even so, we said one in three chances it will double this year, but I said I won, and two chants it would lose thirty forty percent. You said, really high chance it would do that. So in a way, what I would like to see is you already cashed in on the bitcoin below, but then maybe we can rock it back up three x from here by end of the year. I'm not predicting that, but that wouldn't that be funny if you hit both. I think that a major financial crisis sits between those two places, and I don't think this year is the year for it, but there's always a chance. Geopolitics. Geopolitics is probably my forte and excited to look at what, you know, where we got with some of this Ukraine formal seats fire. We didn't have an approximate eighty percent, And I'm wondering what that he says has seemed high. If we said eighty percent, we were way wrong. But that that war seems like there's no end in sight. But it's a lot less ground combat and a lot more missile strikes now, so it's not it's not the full out war that we've seen at times in that theater. Let's go right into that. Let's see I have the exact feedback from the chat, not just this dashboards. So this is kind of our first deep dive into something to see if we remembered it correctly or evaluating the system doesn't. This may not be right. We'll see here we go, Uh, this is the output from the system. The transcript reality says, there's you said an eighty five percent chance of ceasefire. I said seventy five percent. I don't believe permanent. Yeah, I don't know if it means a permanent seasfire though it might be just like, oh, we think the seasfire breaks within a week, fifty to fifty chance that it would break within a week if declared. So I guess what they declared, but it would break. I guess did we get an Eastern truce? They had a brief one, didn't. They Maybe something we got to dig deeper into and what's the exact definition? But the big in the big scheme of things, though there's no long term seaspire. So geopolitically, were the same place as we were at the beginning of the year. I believe there was like you know, some periods of sea spires, but then also violations thereof in the middle. Just like everything that's happened since Epic Fury, we're at a you know, a seaspire, except parts of the Iranian military didn't get the memo and they're still shooting, right. Yep. That actually has even more variants or shorter seasfire periods, it seems. So I'm gonna flag this to follow up. See if there was seven consecutive days of a ceasefire, but in the end. It's just a little kind of academic I guess, because it's still ongoing conflict right now, still got another six plus months, see if we can see if that does happen or not. But yeah, just to reiterate, both of us said at least one and two chance that if there is a formal ceasefire would break within a week and less than one week, less than one a week. So yeah, that makes sense. Now Taiwan, don't see as show that's seven and a half percent if anything else went lower with the just sheer demonstration of aerospace force by right, you know, the United States Air Force, Navy, and Space Force all three, what the missileary with what we were able to do with isr just a sheer demonstration of force against Iran. I don't I don't think you know China's prospects of doing that. We're much much better under Biden than right now. Okay, on the exact transcript analysis, you said five percent, I said ten percent. That's where that seven point five percent comes in. So it is a little bit of a blended score. So yeah, all these less all these were the middle of where we both came in. Yeah, except the couple that I think we explicitly stated we were going to have separate numbers, but maybe I gotta, you know, we'll go fact check that we mostly come to a decent number of consensus. I guess number twelve. I'm not sure if I'm not sure if fury or even what Israel and has well, you know, in Lebanon. I'm not sure if major war counts when there isn't you know, major ground action, but that that one, of course doubles in details. What do you call major war? Mhm, it's it says that as well. It's like an active watch escalation risk, but the system doesn't judge it as a major Middle East or I don't know. It's probably about as close as you could be and not be classified as such. If you like, how much fund could you got out arguing. There's other constructs though, that about how to think about war and in military US military doctrinal terms, these things. There's a spectrum of war right from low intensity to high intensity, and all of this is still not even halfway towards high intensity. Right, you're not committing ground troops and you're not fighting on the ground. You are you are not anywhere near a high intensity conflict when you when you don't. Right now, it's pretty much two nation states against one us IS versus Iran. That's also kind of defying definitions of major. Major would be you know, dozens of states on either side. You know, you know, you know, in something like a world war, right, So but you know, you know, it depends on your perspective, you're not I If US military doctrinal definitions are not something that guide your view of the world, then this epicurity, you know, just in air space and naval it's pretty major, but it's not the full compliment. I'm maybe biased because I was in the army, right, you know, we we don't have troops on the ground. That would be a whole other level. The thing that stands out based off that and what we saw, we had a fifty chance that there was going to be a major near Middle East war? So was that way too high then? Or do you think fifty percent is appropriate now? Or do you think it's higher because we had fifty. No, because I'm pretty sure Israel is going to do this with or without us. In fact, I think Trump said that at the beginning, right, So you know there was there was going to be action. And I think that country, if they hadn't had us with us, would have gone back to what they did during last summer. They had troop, they had troops on the ground in Israel, in Iran. In fact, I think we do. It's just all covert right now, right, not large numbers, and they're well protected from the air, so and and everything that we got going on there could become major war with if if the decision is you know, if the if the deciding factor is you know, is there you know, open ground occupation, Yeah, then we then we have a major war. You carg well, talk we can talk more like opinion, our thoughts later, Let's do the facts, finish up the dashboard, because we could talk about all these things for quite a while. Here we go, three regimes collapsing, four sorry, four of them Venezuela, Iran, Cuba, North Korea. Take it away. So so thirteen that fifty is obviously too low because Maduro's not there now. If you want to argue whether the form of government has to change for the regime to fully collapse, well a pretty novel approach to doing this is to keep the regime in place and decapitate it. And then coerce it so that you know it's it's not even the same regime anymore. But there is not the same regime in Caracas any longer. So I think I think we hit that one. It asks us, the system asks us to also discuss and confirm whether we think this should be triggered because Maduro was removed. It pretty much literally says partial hit, could be a full hit. If the hosts you and I confirm on air, that disqualifies. So are we going to say it qualifies as a hit. It's a hit in my book, because it's a hit, not only like like if it was just a rate in the in the captured the leader and withdrew with him and left the regime entirely alone and in place, then that's not a hit. But that's not what happened, right, The CIA director and the South come demanding General are both in there, like visibly in there right, like photo ops of them in there. That regime is entirely you know, taking its orders from Washington. It's not the same regime. I give it a hit, too, So let's just chalk it up. It's a it's a hit. We said fifty fifty hindsight, that's lower, but I bet higher than the market rate, like the poly market equivalent. We should cross reference that for the end of year. Now this maybe now I ran, Yeah, I ran. It's a different argument, right, And it's pretty obvious that tiers of the Iranian regime at the top have been obliterated, not just collapse, but we're down to the third and fourth and fifth tiers and they're still resisting. Right, So can the rest remnant of the Mulah regime survive the rest of the year? I give it forty five percent or somewhere. We gave it forty five. You know before epic fury that percentage chance has to be higher at the midyear checkpoint. I could What would you give it? I mean, it's got to be eighty five ninety. No, that might be too high. That might be too No, No, it's not enough. There's no hundreds here anywhere. But you know, from a from a forty five, I'd give it a solid seventy. Now, if you know the right intelligence was acquired and new strikes took us to from the third level of the regime down to the fifth, and we don't know what's going on behind the scenes, right, like slowly, but surely that regime is under you know, constant pressure to to you know, to turn on itself, to make compromises, to negotiate. But still best I could do is probably seventy percent on that now, the very solid thirty chance that it's the mosaic regime, right, it just just it's it's a theocracy. So it's a belief system in there. Can you get down to the you started with the Ayatola it was number one? If killed the top ten thousand, is the next ten thousand just as radical as the top ten thousand? Well yeah, I mean that that's the equation there. It's you can't just grab, you know, capitate and have the country fold and capitulate that. That's exactly what happened in Venezuela. Iran's not Venezuela, Cuba. Though this year a twenty five percent chance probably should be raised base of what happened to Venezuela and Iran. You almost think it has to, right, So the Iran going back there, seventy percent is fair. Yeah, nothing's one hundred percent, but man, if they last, I don't know, I understand that seventy is still pretty high number, but I feel like it should be higher, even because how could they possibly last till December with literally the chokehold on them. That would be it'd have to go more than twice as long as they've already gone and still maintain grip and the economic aspect of the bombing, the internal strife. But like you said, they the mosaic, the mosaic analogy is perfect. So okay, seventy percent. I'm gonna go ahead and put seventy five percent just to be a differentiator. No, I'll stick with seventy. We'll defer to you. We'll stick with one number. Seventy and Cuba was twenty five percent. What are you saying that's going to go. Up to now? They're fifty to fifty right now in my. Book, fifty in just six months too. Especially after that indictment of Rock Castro. Right, the indictment against Castro. It's like setting it up teeing it up. North Korea seven point five percent, obviously much lower than these other three. I don't see any reason for it to be high or lower. But what about you? It depends on the health of the dictator. I don't think that regime has the same kind of you know, it's not it's not a theocracy, it's a communist regime. So and it's a culture personality, and it has been the culture personality since you know, the current dictator's grandfather saw a bit if they had, you know, some kind of break in that chain, and it has. It's the other half of the same country in the south that could absorb and governed. So I think, I think I'm still a very low chance that we see North Korea collapse this year. But CIA said the same thing about the Soviet Union a month before it came aparts. Go on domestic you ready insurrection act posse kamatatis no formal invocation. At this point we said sixty chance. And this goes hand in hand with the next two sustained multi city riots, we said there's a ninety percent chance, and for George Floyd level riot damage or greater, we said thirty percent chance. Now, last week on the show, we talked quite a lot about this, and even the week before, I think, so, do you think those numbers maintain because we're just now entering the summer, or were they a little too high or what are you thinking? They're not high, They're not high. They some the first in the set and the last one might be low. We got the New York threatening the block Ice Mega Operation, which has been threatened during the World Cup. We got a new Jersey detention center for ice under constant riot conditions. You know this is this is all solid predictions. In my book. We have major cyber or grid event fifteen chance that has not hit up or down on that. I don't believe we are under I don't don't. I don't credit cyber as an area that we're at risk. Really, that number is getting lower. And that's the dashboard through June tenth, twenty twenty six. Now this dash we're certainly different than the future danger dashboard. We're gonna get to that dashboard shortly, but let's summarize it. We had a total of twenty predictions or kind of categories with prediction that tagged alown to it, and eight hit. Let's check the math here. Ready, eight hit two are trending towards a hit. So if you take what hit and what the AI believes is trending towards a very high likelihood, that's ten out of twenty halfway not bad at all. Then there's eight which are a classified as to watch or partial hit or possible hit. You know, it's hard. Each one you got to look at individually, but call those like coin flips. Maybe, so let's just say three or four of those might turn out. I don't know, it doesn't work like that, but it's possible we'll have fourteen, fifteen, sixteen of these hitting. Hopefully not more than that though, because some of these are very serious bad things. If they too many of these hit, you know, very big problems. So what's your overall take now zooming out? I think that's a good question. What are we are we even baselining the right way? Are we giving ourselves easy things? If we're getting fourteen or higher out of twenty seventy percent or higher we're getting hits, we probably we're you know, on the timid side of our predictions. But you know, still got happy year to go. We might not be looking so good by the end of this year. Some that, you know, really it's going to hinge on a lot on the rioting aspect. If there are not serious riots, we'll have a few misses, and I want to miss I want to find that being a problem. If those do hit, then yeah, we will be hitting us. I don't. I don't think we sandbagged here. We hit quite a large variety. And I thought we gave pretty realistic, rational explanations of our predictions, but still quite early. But I don't know, I may I think maybe we just have a pretty good read on things possibly future. Dan, which is where we want to be. Which is the whole point of the exercise is you know, we don't we don't want anything bad to happen, right, We want all of these indicators a danger to you know, to dissipate. And this is kind of an abstract conversation. We're we're we're talking about how well do we predict bad news, not whether we want bad news to happen, right, But but we're on the Prepper broadcasting network. If you're not forecasting the future and prepping, if it's so simple minded, is you know, a long time ago, you just gave up hope on the mandy and you're gonna you know, just stockpile and and and and train and endure life to the last moment of your life without any regard towards what the environment is. Well, it's a strategy. It's a strategy, but there's other strategies. And the other strategy is be ready for the circumstances in which you live. And we're trying to get good at that. Well, I for one, became a prepper and into all this stuff more than ten years ago, and I did not think you would get all the way this far. So I'm glad I did not quit my job and go live in the forest because I would be totally bankrupt right now rather than building resources to prep with. But on the other hand, you might want to have a bug out location or at least a backup plan if you get laid off, right, Like, So, prepping takes all types of forms, and hey, your information awareness unless you're going all in on I don't want any information. I'm just homesteading prepping, cutting the world out, Like you said, that's a strategy. You either got to go all in on that, or you gotta have some information awareness right even on that. You gotta know who's on the other side of the hill from you. Right exactly. Yeah, So we'll do this again in December at the season finale of the fall season. This is the season finale of the spring season. Halfway in. Yeah, and we got a major innovation. This year, we got actual graphic representation from this awesome dashboard. So I appreciate it, appreciate you pulling it together, and uh, just for the audience, just stand by. We're going to try and make it even greater in December. Look forward to it. Yeah, we put a lot of real intelligence into this, but now the ability to turn it into a dashboard into more visual and using the transcripts from our show. I have a few notes taken right now, but they're more big picture. I'm not literally writing exactly every single point, but it's really cool how that could be integrated. So again, we'll keep tracking this, keep adding to this, and we can do year of a year analysis. We're just building a library from top to bottom. Really cool. Hey, I want to do a shout out. Looks like firewoo, Forge is in the chat. What's happening fire with Forge? Going to see you man. This is our season finale. We planned to be off next week, but we always reserve the right to come back if anything's hitting the fan or we just feel like it. But we're planning to have next week off. We're returning on or about the twenty fourth or twenty fifth of June. Not exactly sure. Actually, you know what, probably the twenty fourth. I'll talk with the Future Dan, but we may just have to lock in Wednesday. But long story short, we'll be off next week. God, we still got a solid hour here though, Future Dan right this, since it's a special review, we are sticking. Around for at least ninety minutes, and we got a major eat map dashboard on Future Danger to get through lots of news tonight. So let's just jump right in if you're ready. I thought it was a good review of you know, really good review of the dashboard predictions. But to the news dashboard we go. You ready, I'm ready, My gosh, I'm gonna go for it. Wish me luck. Here we go. Those a viewing on Rumble or watching the archive, et cetera, you can see it Future danger dot com. I'm gonna be pithy. I'm gonna try my hardest. Here we go. Start with economic stuff. The economy indicators. Consumer prices rise four point two percent annually, the highest in three years. Stocks for the daily drop that's been the largest since April twenty twenty five. It's because they think the Fed's gonna raise rates after a decent jobs report and a lot of other stuff going on. The FED may actually raise rates definitely not lower. Stocks drop big time, two trillion wiped out. Actually President looking into the US taking steak and some AI companies bankruptcy filings served seven percent year over year. There's well, everyone's quite aware of the social security shortfall, but it's expected to accelerate even outstriped prior predictions. Twenty thirty two funds will be critical. That is six years from now. Signs a peer of global trade starting to slow a little bit. A lot of mixed signals out there, I feel like, though, especially with trade, Let's go to natural indicator's health and the natural world. Some relatively big earthquakes had Cuba had one hundred biggest and one hundred and fifty years six point one magnitude felt in Jacksonville a little bit even there's a big time eruption in Japan, some heat advisories in the central US, fireweather developing across the western US about that time of year. Then we got a little bit more focused on science and health. Smartphones reduce birth rates, studies say this under naturally natural family falls. China engineers bird flu viruses five hundred and sixty thousand times more lethal in mammals. I don't even know how they measured that, but China's engineering their own bird flu viruses. Of course, we have and are sure screwworm first confirmed detection. We talked a little bit about that last week. Apparently not a threat to the food supply, but we'll keep an eye on it. Abola not as many headlines as last week, but still a couple serious ones. It rivals the twenty fourteen outbreak, maybe even out stripping it a little bit. And if you come down with this particular variant, no treatment available, horrible. Let's move on to security indicators. We'll go with the highest most actualized SHTF rated FBI and the MI five warning against Chinese military spying. This goes hand in hand with what we talked about last week. Just moored piled on top China spending billions to stop AI and data centers. Americans working for Beijing state media please guilty spying for China. We also got a Israeli spying being brought up to say the least, DA Defense Intelligence Agency raised his threat of Israeli spied on us to the highest level. Congresswoman says Epstein had intelligence connections. Oh do you say this is huge? Future Dam was bringing this up in the back channels over the last week, the truth of Butler coming out. FBI records reveal redacted emails between would be Trump assassin Crooks with a deputy prior to the Butler attack. There a remote device with an antenna was found in Crooks's pocket after he was killed. A suspicious person who was reported before the shooting was never found. I remember talking about that man with a camera bag entered building near the shooter and vanished. All this provable. Now, second person at the scene based off witness descriptions, so this evidence exists, has been out there. Red pickup driver repeatedly watched area before an attack. Detection dog alerted below Crooks's rooftop position. It's early reports mentioned multiple operators down possible shootout. Crooks had pre attack email contact with local officials. We already talked about the deputy, but another witness too. Apparently, released records leave several leads near shooting site unresolved. As we've gone through most of them. Each of these headlines I'm reading has an entire article. You should go review them. Major portions of the FBI file remain sealed her with held, So this is what's come out, what could be sealed or with held ICE. Future Dan talked about this a bit earlier, ICE agents arrest riders attacking vehicles outside Newark detention facility, and more recently, we have New York basketball fans physically attack San Antonio supporters in New York City streets Tuesday night after a Game three at NBA Finals, ANTIFA mob riots outside of TPUSA event in Texas, and raced riot feared after nineteen year old black team found guilty of murdering seventeen year old white team during Texas track meet. But these are relatively you know, low level has not triggered our dashboard, as an example, our prediction dashboard for massive riots countrywide by any means. But we're watching, we're watching the sparks, so we're ready if it flames up. President and New York Mayor are on a collision course about ice at the Soccer World Cup. That's what Future Dan was really hitting on. World Cup starts. I guess tomorrow or the next day something like that in US, Mexico, Canada. So yeah, a lot of people coming in New York Ice surge is there to meet them, and let's run through super fast. Oh, actually I missed at least one here Russian deputy Foreign minister threatens nuclear attack. Just gotta throw that one in there. I got another one I might have missed. I tried to order them and I got too fancy. But I'm getting better at not missing them. At least. Here's another one outgoing Director of National Intelligence to declassify COVID nineteen documents. I would have been pissed if I missed that one. Hopefully future Dan was going to point it out. But that one's huge. COVID nineteen documents. All right, I think I can now move on to our liberty column I call the Bill of Wrights column. Sort of kind of elections are stolen indicator pretty hot. FEDS probe multiple election fraud cases in California. Lawsuit exposes eight hundred and seventy three thousand ghost of voters in California. Questions piling up fast as candidate suddenly loses second place in LA mayor race. Multiple ballots found inside Los Angeles County Library Shenanigans. To say the least I know if Futurdan gets pissed. My call shenanigans because it's very serious. So how about just fraud and crime? US and Iran exchanged strikes in the Gulf. This after seemingly promising sees fire negotiations seems to break down. An Apache helicopter was shot down, crew was rescued. US strikes back. Proportional response necessary. I mean you gotta do that. Obviously, Indian tanker struck by US Navy off oman that was earlier this week refused to respond to orders related to the blockade. So I believe futured Dan. That was the full on dashboard. No, I skipped to one why because I hate talking about it. This one was more of a mental block. Epstein, Epstein, Epstein, Epstein assistant planning to tell all book. Palm Beach police chief says, DOJ works to protect Epstein. So Epstein actually crosses a couple columns here still future Dan, and he died six seven plus years ago. Legacy continues, or. Did he. Or did he? Yeah? Do you want to go? This is a very hot heat map dashboard, and I think every time we end a season we take a week off afterwards, usually not this hot. So the prospect of we convening next week. We got a lot of black on red happening now, a lot of news. Where do you want to go with it? Well, Fire with Forge puts in chat he saw something about Texas saying no screw worm there, but New Mexico just reported they have some. This is rated fairly high on ours. So let's go with it, the flesh eating screw at worm. But uh, you know, I guess long story short, what I want to know is, first, is this going to threaten the food supply? Second? Is this some sort of sabotage or just a natural thing? What do you think here? For ju Dan, what do you know about this screw worm? Well, to answer both those questions quickly, I suggest, you know the right people with military labs get a hold of those and check to see if their genome has been edited. I should certainly hope they did that many weeks ago. What else would they be there for? Yep, And we wouldn't know either way, right, you know, Although if they've done it and they know that it's naturally occurring, it's just this parasite's back, you know, they you know, they might spend the time to explain that to those of us who care. But yeah, with the ability to edit genomes, artificial intelligence, genetic editing. I mean, if trying to spend it money to get us to not build data centers, why wouldn't they do that too. It's not out of the remel possibility, Like you said, I hope it just doesn't snowball where if they do that, we do something back and it just continues to escalate. So yeah, worldwide Cobert genetic warfare. Right, Yeah, it's scary. Half released, It's scary, isn't it. Yep, something you can't see, something you can't really protect yourself from, might not know if you already got got the bug. I don't know. I can't let it freak you out, but it is freaky. The year is twenty twenty six, Okay, it's definitely not in Kansas anymore. And the stuff that you know directly comes after you COVID nineteen, that's one thing. But things that interrupt food supplies, right, they have economic impacts. You're not gonna ever die because of this parasite. It doesn't work that way, but you know, just a complete attack on our economy. It's covert hybrid sixth generation, really nasty form of warfare if it's true or this is just no naturally occurring we got we got to eradicate it again, like like we had by nineteen sixty six. And this by itself doesn't seem like it'll be a major crisis that destroys everything. But add this on with dozens of other little nicks and cuts, and yeah, there you go some of the high highest inflation and low low herds, low number of herds, like head of cattle. Hey, this is your homework, fire with forge. Put it in chat am I not correct that, Like the head count of cattle is like super low right now, already I heard that. I heard that, really heard it right? So yeah, mulla combined. I heard since the nineteen seventies last time, or I read somewhere recently. Since the seventies, we haven't had a cattle herd. This this small, you. Know, So if we had to I don't know whatever they call it, destroy five ten twenty, that I'll have some knock on effects. Now it would be recoverable as long as it's not too nasty of a virus or something. Right, but we saw what happened with eggs. Like I could go get a dozen super organic eggs for like four dollars now, whereas the basic eggs were eight dollars when there was that big fear and they had to call some herds or you know, flocks. I suppose. So there is those ebbs and flows. But if there's too many, if they line up all those sine waves at once, and they could just bam hit a criticality of Yeah, that's what we're looking for here, trends that might line up all those sine waves into one. I think that was the Biden outgoing lame duck USDA and FDA that ordered the killing of those chickens last late last year. Sure, I think it was literally like December January of twenty five. Maybe because of the strength of our country, strength of our economy. It's you're right, it bounce back, but it is. It does resemble things like what Stalin did to Ukraine in the nineteen thirties, right, starve your enemies or at least make make your successor who beats you in his comeback election look bad for like two weeks in the beginning of his term. It's just another distraction. What else we got in here? It's got to be more salient expressing matters than cattle parasites, screworms. I understand. I would say Butler. Butler came almost out of nowhere. I wouldn't was the last time we talked about Butler, when it was the last time Butler really showed up as more than maybe a topical on future danger. I mean, I'll look into that, but what are your thoughts off the top? This is the first major revelation. This is a Freedom of Information Act request. These are FBI redacted documents, but not completely redacted. And just for the record, all those links on future danger they go to the same article from this organization that got the records, and in the spirit of disclosing when we you know, use AI, I threw the article into a prompt and asked it to identify any fact in the unredacted release that points to the possibility of there being you know, more accomplases or more than one, you know, member of an attempt to assassinate Trump. And the product of that AI prompt is all these separate sub headlines. I do that once in a while to really make the point, because you know, people see headlines and they, you know, might just go no further, right, Well, you I guess what. Now, you don't have to go any further because all those facts are in there and they're surprising, and the fallout from this is not even begun. No, not at all. And I hope more comes out too, because they say a lot it's still sealed now. Of course, not all of it will come out, and not all this should come out. There's a lot of types of national security issue they don't want to expose, especially like this secret service or anything like that. But I don't know. More truth is also good on the other hand, So I like to see this. You think there's any one smoking gun article you want to dive deeper into, I mean there's like eight or ten. We can go through a few if you want. It's all the same article. There are links so the same article. But I think if Republicans hold the House in November, you'll see hearings and the redacted names will be brought for made. But if the opposite happens, it could be you know who the names are and what else. You broke up there a little bit at the end. I got most of it, though, but I gave I definitely saw what you mean now that it was all the almost every one of these headlines links to one article. There's a kind of a headline by itself, but all these intended. Yes, you're correct, it's just kind of grabbing phrases. That makes sense, now, I get, I get where you're coming from. Am I coming in clearly? Now? Coming in clearly? Now? Yeah? So a lot of evidence there that there was multiple shooters and someone setting them up to do it, and I think we got to know the truth. Someday it's gonna happen. The truth will be brought out on that one. Well, hopefully the truth comes out. With Tulsa Gabber pushing the classification of COVID cover up as well. Butler and COVID, both of those more truth like to see it. Havana Samms in there as. Well, answer me this, Why would any COVID records need to be classified if if it wasn't a man made espionage operation. I got my own conspiracy theories. But I heard that there might be some people in the United States that helped with all this. It's not just China doing it, and that might be bad for now the look of our country, it might be worth covering up. So it's not as not as bad. Just thinking, no, there's a lot of them. Do we want to know that they've been doing all this experimentation They lied, you know, Fauci lies, They've been doing all this experimentation Chapel Hill and they you know, they've been involved with all types of shady stuff in Wuhan and in Ukraine and everywhere else. So like they don't want to embarrass the deep state too much, just like Epstein. They can't let it all out, That's what I think. Which day are we talking about again? They who are really in charge? They that's not true. Man, Well, who's stopping Gabbard from declassifying all the COVID nineteen somebody is right. I don't know, we might get it all. Isn't that what she's doing. I've just seen a lot of times where they say they declassify everything, and then ten years later like, oh yeah, here's a few more things, and those things are heavily reenacted. I mean, look at the JFK assassination, for example. How many times have they had disclosure and it's still like half asked in a lot of regards. So well, they they potentially in the JFK took over the government, LBJ that's not what happened. They ever dethroned or did it actually get more entrenched and worse over the fifty years, seventy years, whatever. So the the guy who dug through the mortgage applications to catch one of the FED governors in the liar loan, right, and and that's still in litigation. Bill Pulte is replacing Gabbert, and the President publicly told him to get in there and fire the deep state. So he's he's he's clearly there as acting director because between directors he has the full power. He's gonna go in there and fire anybody that won't classify. All right, this is the one best chance to clean that shit out, and I think they're serious about doing it. Just think there's a day they conditionally stop what's coming their way right now. I hope so, I hope, so I want it. But I guess if I put a little more thought into it, I would say, simply put, the US has all types of clandestine bio warfare, biodefense, whatever you want to call it. So I'm sure that you know what some of this information might be too tangently related to that. We got to put a quash on it or national security, either legitimately or not. That's the day, like there's there's someone behind the censor, Like who are they? Do we trust them? Maybe they're doing the right thing. I don't want China and like the public to know all of our secrets of our bio defense that might be implicated in COVID nineteen. So maybe not everything right. Well, I take your off. I think you're operating off of the assumption that everything was documented. So some act of declassification is a binary all or none when much of this was just spoken word, right, you know the Builderberg meeting, Right, go and talk about it, don't write it down, right, So to the extent that it could be declassified, but as long as the point is clear and we never have to argue in the future with Democrats that this happened and it was evil and wrong, and the military labs long ago abdicated all of this to the civilian agencies. Just probably why it should have you know, was able to happen, and really rotten apples in the in the National Institute of Health and the CIA. It's collaborate much better to prove it and make sure everybody knows it or history than not. I like that. There's definitely good attitude and just like the preponderance of evidence. Hey, we don't even need to declassify the rest. You're so caught red handed, tanways for Sunday, like the court of public opinion. Now at least we know your scumbag fauci. Like I've been convinced on that, so I get it there. It's just like, is it technicality that they can get away on? Well, okay, whatever, but uh, we're not gonna forget. I'll tell you that. She used to believe he was on stage and at one point Trump was standing there nodding his head to what what's out. She was saying, that's still surreal to me. I don't know, but let's see, let's see what happens. We we we we also got some We also got a release this week. I didn't pay too close attention to it. Some some financial guy was imprisoned and and and Trump's gonna pardon him on the last day of his first term, and the Department of Justice at that point it's actually threatened the president that if you pardon this guy, he you know, he's you know, we're gonna come after you. And they did, so we had a you know, federal departments that once they knew Trump was on the way out in the first term, we're actually threatening him, right, So think about that background like, that's a big part of what's happening right now is is foaming through the bureocracy and we're hitting it. Of those deep. I can support that definitely. Who I'm consuming him is a good question, though it does take a lot of time. Burns up a lot of energy too. I think the deep state is as weak, weak as it's been in several decades right now because of this. I can agree that it definitely took a punch in the nose or two from all this. I don't think they're down for the count, but they got knocked down maybe maybe. And also Trump doesn't necessarily need Congress to clean out these people, so that's part of the reason why, you know, maybe he doesn't care how the outcome of the election. I'm sure he does, and he's got some tricks up his sleeve. There's more events, few political and other that are going to just unfold that are completely going to change the narrative before the election, and the Supreme Court any day now could do things about how mail in ballots are are eligible or not. And I did hear a report right before this episode of Patrio Power Hour that Trump's going to order the US Postal Service to not handle mail in ballots in any state that hasn't released its voter rules, which you know is scoring straight to court. But he's definitely on the attack when it comes to cleaning up the vote. I like that. That's definitely check mark on the right side of the column. Well, I it where you it doesn't need to worry about the election too much. He needs to just do the right things, make things happen. But we also got to build momentum. Like I just feel like if there's a total collapse and the Democrats get back in power, man, they're gonna do everything possible and never lose it again. And obviously we'll be there to fight them. They're gonna, you know, fair elections, fair you know fair constitution and America is based on. But I'm just saying, like, if you go all out and maybe some good things are being done long term, but you lose that election, that might they may make us regret that. That's all. I don't know. Just one of the houses of the Congress for two years be able to you know, be on on the attack on Trump. You know, it might might be quite enough for for America to remember why they really don't like that political party. Yeah, good point. Got to force them out at least to their Heidi holes. Right, All right, well we got solid go ahead, go ahead, We got about twenty five minutes. We still got some time. Yeah, I want to talk about Israeli spying, but maybe we should finish there. Is there any other topics that you want to hit on. Economics doesn't have any too motivated today, and that's big for the breaker banksters to say. The new Federal Reserve chair speaking tomorrow, we'll see what they do with any rates. We of course thought they could lower rates a lot this year. They're talking about possibly raising rates because inflation's a little hot and employment's not horrible, so maybe they got some room to raise rates. But besides that, and definitely some choppiness and downward trend in bitcoin, silver, gold, I don't know, not seeing a ton right now. Employments actually numbers have been good recently. Right, which means they can't lower rates, which means they got more room to raise rates, maybe even to stop inflation, but I don't know if they're actually going to do that. Yeah, so let's get into. Let's get into the geopolitics. So Israel as a state, and then there's you know other you know, the other side of the coin. So I was kind of thinking about this and you look at you know, imagine the world of all the nation states, every every nation state that you know is in the UN for example, right from you know, perhaps even down to lick Liechtenstein and Andra, some of those micro states Monaco, Europe like that, Stay Shello Islands, something with you know, very small small country, very small nation state, up to all the biggest ones right ourselves, China, Russia, Indiana, so all the big ones and and you know, we like metaphors on patriot power, so we definitely have used him in the past. I'm gonna use one tonight try to round out this season finale of Patriot Power. Are So I'm asking you to imagine all the nation states of the world as coins you like finance. So I didn't I didn't necessarily do this just for you, but I thought after I thought about it, was like, perhaps he's gonna like this. So you know, take the word nation state right on one side of the coin is the nation the other side of the state, and bring it home. You know, you're odd member of our nation and a very very strong opponent to most of the state that governs your nation, federal, state, local. You're a libertarian, so you're you're you want it to be as minimized in your life as possible. Right. And there's other nations and they have other states, right, And some of those nations are you know, in favor of most of them, most of the Sistans probably in favor of the tyranny that they live under. And I just thought of this metaphor ben to to help explain my worldview. So I'm going to pause there. You know, just the concept of a nation state point two sides integral. You got a nation, you got a state, right. And there are stateless nations Palestinians, Roma, and you're in Europe, right, there's stateless people. In this case, we're talking about nation states, and you can't can't have a nation without a state, and you can't have a state without a nation. If you accept those chemistis, then I think we can explore with those ideas. I'm gonna stop there and get your reaction to just the metaphor point as a nation state. I understand it, But now I'm trying to imagine like one hundred and seventy coins or whatever. Is that the next step or I guess to some degree. Right, yeah, Yeah. Imagine the table and you got all those coins on the table, and all the head sides are the states, and all the tail sides are the nation. Let me say nation. We're talking about the language, the ethnicnicity or ethnicities, the religion or religions, right, especially the language though, and the creeds. Just the people, people and all the various dimensions that we measure people a politically, right, the political side of the coin is the state, but on the on the nation side, just the demos in democracy, the people. Imagine. Imagine you saw a table and all the coins were turned on the on the tail side of the keep side. What do you see if you see that. The people side, like the actual people of the nation. What would I see if all of them were there? We know, just with with without their government in the conversation, just the peoples of the world. Hmm, much more similar than their governments probably, I would say, still differences across, but it'd be more similar than the nations possibly. The state all kinds of different kinds of nations, right, And some of those nations, the majority of their people are in favor of the rotten tyranny in there in their nation state, right, So I do hold them accountable. Right. So you know, the ultimate you know example in history is probably you know, the German people supporting the third right, right, and it's in the German people vastly supported the Third Reich, and the German people heavily for that, right, So you got that out there. To me when I see the you know, all the all the people sides of the coin, I just I just want freedom for them. I want them to have at the freest possible states as they can possibly have in my lifetime. I want them to live without tyranny, right, I want them to be Yeah, they don't have to be a Jeffersonian democracy necessarily. I have to have a mirror copy of our constitution. Yeah, we have our own problems, and they've been getting worse over the years. For still, you know, on that table, the people side, we are the example of the world, the Golden City on the hill to what freedom looks like. I want that for everybody on the people's side. Well, I do too, for sure, and there is a little bit of nuance to it of certain systems work better for certain societies maybe, But I still think a lot of the principles are pretty pretty clear. So maybe it's not strict Jefferson, you know, jeff Thomas Jefferson ideals, but I think a lot of it would apply to all people's It's just I don't know. I guess the history culture do make a difference, but I don't know. Freedom is freedom is freedom too though. Right now, if you're opinion that some people have to be ruled by dictatorships, you know, that's an argument, right. The people are realist about this, you know, they look at Russia to be like that. You know, Moscow has never supported a free government of the people, right, It's never happened in China, it's never happened in Iran. Right. It's just it's not in those people that all people, you know, have the government that they deserve. Kind of attitude, sort of pessimistic, realist kind of point of view. It's not me, that's not me, because every fraction of the people on that side of the coin, they believe in freedom, now it's for fifty years, vast majority of that slice of humanity has fled to the United States of America. Right. They came to America to get away from that and get to the freedom. Right. So but I want that, you know, outside of any systems, the civil society, the people. When I'm looking at that side of the coins, that's what I want from. So you flip the coins to the state side, then my attitude about points starts to get, you know, wildly different. So I, you know, kind of dig into my view of that. Just I want to walk you through this thought experiment. Foot all those coins to the governmental side and the state side scluding the US. Tell me what you see on the. Table, bad imagery like lots of uh boots stopping on people's faces, just different degrees of it really. And a war shark there. Yeah, you were like uh skull and crossboats and abuse and stealing. Even the US, I see, like it's fairly pitiful. It's way better than the rest or most of the rest, but it's still like rule by terror and fear of a gun, not out of peace and prosperity. So there you go. That's that's a very idealistically libertarian lens, and I respect that it's your that is your lens, and I respect that mine mine's Mine's different for me. You know. Now, now I'm looking at the types of government that are in place, and and I'm looking at ones that I favor, and and and then it trends towards really disfavoring right right, Why if Congress will the vote to authorize epic fury, I'm one hundred percent with it because that Mulo regime is one of the ugliest coins on the table. Beijing, Moscow, Havanon right, go down the list, even run it through all the monarchies, those are repugnant to me, even the even the constitutional marketing monarchies that hang onto there that they're monarchs, the members, you know, the the family members attend Builderberg. That's repugnant to me. Even even when you're in the zone of parliamentarian democracies, it's you know, I I You're closer to home with me if the demos the other side of the coin, if it's ruling itself, and if the demos the other side of the coin can change its government, which is why when I'm looking at is really all time, you know, or shall we say highest alert level of buying. You know, take it with a grain of salt. It's a it's a people with a state, and that state is looking out for its people. If that involves buying against us, no one should be surprised. They're they're always trying to do that. By the way, all of our NEATO allies are industrial espionage. French. French was French. The French were a leader of that for many decades, taking taking some of our secrets, especially radio communication and avionics. Right, it happens, it happens, right, But they are you know, not even close to you know what what the government of in China is to us. Right, So it's it's it's for me, it's a very big sliding scale and that you know, I don't know how you describe that politically, but I consider it patriotic. Right, I'm a patriot. I'm an American patriot. Our our our country is is not necessarily an ethnic country. It's a it's an ideological country. So if if your ideology is American, you know you're you're an American to me. And as long as our cup coin on that table is the biggest, the brightest, and more most valuable where every everybody liked to be. That's that's that's safe for us. That's that's where we tie back to Prepper Broadcasting network. That that you know, and from within US ours that want to you know, change our coin on both sides that you know, the people who are not patriots of the United States of America. Those that's why I oppose. That's why I'm on this show every week to talk out against them. I thought that's a useful nation state coin metaphor for you. I'm giving it a lot thought and it kind of you know, it helps me, you know, rationalize, like obviously Israel they'll spy on us, and and and if you look at from their point of view, wanting to know what our negotiators are doing relative to their national security, it's like obviously they would do that. Wanting to you know, integrate science and technology so that they can build and have the weapons systems that serve the state and the nation of Israel. Obviously they're going to do that. And if if every country in the world had a parliamentarian system, maybe that kind of behavior towards us would start to really draw my ire right, there's so so many worse. Example, you cut out at the very end there, but you're saying there's just many worse examples, right, Oh, you totally zoned out. Maybe let me know when you get this. I'll keep all keeping an ear out for you. But I heard almost everything you said there. I agree wholeheartedly. I feel like the people can affect the nation, and the nation can affect the people. Like if you have a totalitarian, authoritarian, shitty government for one hundred years straight, that'll have negative repercussions for your people. They'll just kind of lose their inspiration. Plus a lot of the let's just say it, like the type of people with bloodlines that would be patriots in Russia and Ukraine in nineteen twenty, they're probably they probably all died, right, they got killed off. Doesn't mean the next generation can't be strong and fight back and get their own freedom, but literally killing off the patriots in some of these countries I think is a literal issue. They can come back. But on the other hand, yeah, you'd have a great, fair government, but if your people become corrupt, lazy, decadent, it'll drag the government down too, for sure. Absolutely well. Future Dan unfortunately hits technical issues I'm sure he'll be back if possible. We've gone about an hour and eighteen minutes, so it's been a great show. If he gets back in, we'll knock out those last ten minutes. If not, I might have a couple of small things to hit on before we get out of here. I'll be on the lookout see if he's able to reconnect. But as always, big shout out Prepper Broadcasting Network. However, you're listening to this show and have been listening, make sure to go follow the other ways to listen to PBN. Not only so it's more convenient for you. You can get the podcast and the video right but it helps with our number of follows. It helps with the algorithm. So really, the podcast numbers have been doing so well in the last few months. Really, so nice to see pretty much anywhere you can find podcasts, just search Prepper Broadcasting Network. So some of you on Rumble go subscribe to the podcast, vice versa. If you're listening to the podcast right now, you want to check out our dashboard that we just talked about today a lot, go to rumble dot com. What's exact address Rubble dot com slash I figure it's just Prepper Broadcasting Network, but I totally don't want to give the wrong one. Ha. Yes, Rumble dot com slash user slash Prepper Broadcasting Network, but if you just search Prepper Broadcasting Network you'll find it for sure. So this has been a really good show. I think overall, top to bottom, bottom to top. I'll stick around another twenty thirty seconds see if future Dan's able to reconnect. If not all good, we plan to be off next week, but we do reserve the right to come back if there's big time breaking news or we just get the itch. But uh yeah, I think Geez, from January first all the way through today June tenth, we had like twenty episodes, baby, so we did not miss I think we only missed two or three weeks, possibly one I was out of the country, one I had something else going. And then we have our pre planned break between the spring and summer, or excuse me, the winter and the spring. So we've been grinding, we've been consistent, we show up. We appreciate all the listeners out there. I'm gonna call it a show. Prepper Broadcasting Network, We love you. This is episode three fifty one of The Patriot Power Hour sign it off, Enjoy your summer. Taught to you soon,