Patriot Power Hour #355

Yeah, what do you want? Statement of purpose? Should I email you? Should I put this on your action item list? You decide your own love love involvement. We are the Proper Broadcasting Network. You are now listening to The Patriot per Hour, the newest show of the Prepper Broadcasting Network. This live episode features the situational awareness you need to practice self reliance and independence. Introducing your hosts, Ben the Breaker of Banksters and Future Dan, the editor of Future Danger dot Com. Patriot Power Hour Live once more July twenty third, twenty twenty six. It's episode three hundred and fifty five. Yeah, three hundred and fifty five episodes and counting to Patriot Power Hour. I bet the Breaker Banksters. Here a Future Dan, Future Dan. You got a lot to talk about. We'll get to the dashboard as we always do. Where do you want to start tonight? Let's go for it. Well, it's a lot of new topics. We've got economics seating up on us. But you can say it's it's topical news. No emergencies, nothing like that. So looking forward to discussing all of this and more on episode three five five at the end of you know, getting near the end of July twenty twenty six. Still no still disturbance riding this summer, which is a good thing relatively speaking. We got no calamity tonight, So we're going to be just reading the reading between the lines and see if that's around the corner then then how so that might be? So the economics scores, metrics and news again, not imminent collapse, but there are some signals that are flashing. And the way I'm looking at it is we're back towards the high water mark where we've been the last few months in terms of pressure on the economic system, and I'm mainly looking at oil and gas prices, as well as the ongoing federal government debt and finally the odds of interest rate increase by the Fed. So all three of those things, they're not flashing red. They're not SHTF. But you know, after what seems like a quiet last month or so, where those problems didn't manifest perhaps as badly as as they could have or should have. Well, they didn't go away, they weren't resolved. Oil above one hundred, gas back to four bucks, ten year treasury back up. I mean, we were talking to some people in the back channels. They said, if ten year treasury hits five percent, that's game over, just because everyone's got so much debt. So I know, I kind of just went through that economic call them by itself, future Dan, But. You already started blitzing. You fell into blitz, then you gotta you gotta blitz the rest of it. I think, all right. There we go. We got them on the run. Banks is on the run, finished the blitz, massive disconnect of power, Royals the largest US electric grid. For closures on the rise nationwide. This is actually the highest rated in terms of danger happening right now, the highest rated article in the economic sphere tonight. Foreclosures on the rise nationwide hand in hand with credit card delinquencies and other upticks. So whether it's personal finance, government, or just the price of energy, all trending in the wrong direction, I'll just take it from here and knock out the rest of them dashboard. Then fine, let's go with it. Natural News and Health. Venezuela quake a month or long, you know, a month plus on, still have five thousand confirmed dead, with many many still missing. Then we have earthquake in the Texas Panhandle, strongest in one hundred years in the Texas Panhandle magnitude five. We've talked all summer about Europe's heat wave over there, a lot of death associated with it, he continues, Actually, NASA Warren scientists are understating the worst case solar storm scenario. We talk of course about EMPs on Future Danger, as well as Patrio Power Hour and of course Prepper Broadcasting Network. But NASA warning that the solar storms are actually just as dangers were more so than the man made Here in this report, we have a little bit volcanic activity, so really runs the gamut of natural disasters or regional disasters, at least on a natural scale. No real health or man made stories. In the fourth column, the column that was totally dominated by COVID, that has seen a lot of abola recently, nothing of the bola that's all gone off of this just an observation. Let's go to the first column, liberty column. This is the trending, really the highest rated and most dangerous of everything. So we're keeping track of it. Under war, unconstitutionally waged Iranian war heating back up, and it has been passed by Congress. Dozens of Air Force tankers sent to Israel ahead of possible escalation with Iran. American forces face rising death toll in escalating war. Yemen strikes back on the table, probably already happening now, and just keep piling on. You know, they're calling it, you know, the twelfth consecutive night, the thirteenth consecutive night of strikes on Iran. It's just open of bombardment almost at this point. So we'll just consider that. Speaking of you know, of course we have war unconstitutionally waged as the indicator we just went through. But how about this one. We don't almost ever see this indicator. Constitutional obsolescence discussed Democrats and socialists. Democrats out there too, dismissing the constitutional traditions of this country as nostalgia, as not needed anymore, as quaint nostalgic high in the sky. Even Trump orders review related to climate guidance for federal judges. And let's move on to the last column for the night. This under the security indicator both international and domestic, FBI calls incendiary attack on a Manhattan federal building an anti government attack. Is the senior Kentucky senator alive under constitutional officer goes missing. We'll dive into that. Russia suspected of helping Iran target CIA sites in the Gulf. Another article, another indicator related to US forces surging towards the Middle East. In fact, just a couple hours ago, the one and Only NBC guy had a daily audio cash talking all about US forces surging towards the Middle East. Check that out if you have it yet. More than one hundred senior PLA officers purged for corruption in the past four years. And last article of the night, Saudi's reached a deal with the United States could let them enrich nuclear fuel. And this is under the indicator Saudi Arabian military nuclearized. Future Dan, I don't think I've ever seen this indicator. We're gonna go to deep dive it real fast. But just when I think I've seen every indicator on future danger dot com with you know, there's one that's prizes me. You definitely thought through this ahead of time. Why do you think Saudi Arabian military nuclearized was worthy of an indicator when you first built this a decade ago? Number one? Number two The most recent article was three years ago almost so there have been articles, but it hasn't picked up. But yeah, just a couple of days ago, just a day ago Saudi's did reach a deal with the US, and that seems like a huge shift. We might be seeing this indicator a lot. And why is it an indicator? Is the question? Yeah, And how do you kind of foresee this as being worth I don't I know how many indicators you have, but you know you can't have infinite amount, and this was one of them. And why was it FO two? It be a four ninety four something like that is the total library. And it included because there are scenarios where we would have to do things to intervene in that region of the world if the Kingdom of Sad fell. So there's a parallel indicator called paks lose control of nukes the Pakistani government, Right, So I look at Pakistan and I look at potentially Saudi Arabia as being a you know, same situation, and you can't necessarily, you know, go to bed that night every night assuming that those regimes can't collapse. And then, you know, compared to Israel or India or even North Korea, right, you know, I just don't something about that region the world. And it's a monarchy, you know, there's a you know, Oslama Bin Laden. He wanted to bring down the House of Sod as much as he wanted to bring down anybody else. So, you know, the radical fundamental Sunni Islamisists, they they they take out that regime if they if they had to, And what would happen is we would have to invade and occupy and stabilize, and that would not be a good situation with nuke's loose. In there, not at all. So let's actually go back to September twenty twenty three, about three years ago, Saudi Crown prints on Iranian nukes. If they get one, we have to get one. Of course, they are mortal enemies, pretty much hate each other as much as they hate Israel. I guess Iran how much Iran hates Israel? But what do you have more details about this deal? We can go read the actual article, why not, but a little bit more details on this current deal that came out. Well, we are paid blocked by New York Times and I will never subscribe to them. But anyway, this latest deal, what can you tell us about it? Yeah, so it's just enrichment nuclear, you know, material, and you know, obviously you know Sadi rab has talked for a long time of getting it for civilian purposes, right, But it's clearly a strategy in Trump's school bag to do a couple of things. H gain favor with the Saudis, simultaneously threatened the Iranians, and bring leverage on the Israelis. Oh, there's no reason that Saudis would not want this. They might not want it, but they're fine with the strategy being employed because the other two in that you know triangle, you know, have to take that seriously because Israelis know that, you know, really vicious Islamisis could overthrow the House Asad and then what loose nukes. You know, no one's putting up. With that sort of game theory, like just because they have this posture in this framework and play, you gotta assume the worst of it and they gotta kind of have that tension. Yeah, and then Trump threw in after making this deal right afterwards through in that it's now contingent upon the stout he's joining the Abraham Accords and recognizing Israel. So I mean, he's he's serious. He wants to bring an established, serious change to the to the balance of power, you know, balance the power in the Middle East and try to bring peace to the Middle East. He considers that, like you know, he'll be remembered for centuries if anything permanent can get established in that way, he's trying to do it. Well, I don't want to commit a sunk cost fallacy, but it's like, at this point, might as well go for it, because halfway down that road and if you half asset or stop right here might be worse. So maybe follow through with it. I don't know, what do you think about that. I've been halfway down that road since ninety forty eight. Yeah, well, now we've got dozens of air force takers going there. You can be a ground invasion of any of those islands or no, it's it's it's. A it's a it's a tool in the in the strategy, right, you know. But I think a lot of what we're seeing in in uh, you know, the continuation of epic fury is you know, another metaphor on patriot power are it's a it's an iceberg, and and you and I are looking at the tip of the iceberg. What's visible on the surface. I think what's underneath is much bigger. Well, from an economic standpoint, one hundred dollars. Oil is not absolutely devastating, so it's not like this is burning the world down where it is. But with the Red Sea, you know, apparently trying to close that down now as well as the straight there is gonna be some just on the margin. What I see this mostly is that the FED can't lower rates. That's how it translates to me, like, what's the negative impact of all this economically? There's just enough of that overall inflation that the FED can't lower rates, And without lowering rates, it's gonna be hard for them to kick start growth to outgrow it unless you get the AI miracle as we talked about, right, But there's a lot of bubble aspect there too. So I think last week you gave a great analogy. It's like, hey, all the or most, if not all, the railroad people who created the railroad, the barons, I suppose in England, if that's what they called them, well guess what. They went busted or the companies went bust, But the railroads remained. That infrastructure remained for our one hundred two hundred years. It was used right, and it's super important to have that. That powered Britain into the twentieth century without those railroads would be tough. I don't know, Yeah, I don't know where this idea keep along that the AI bubble means it's going to burst and after that everything's going back to no one uses chatbots, and it's back to business as usual. And then and we'll just to forego the obvious productivity leap that it provides. Now, however, people financially speculating AI is temporary. The productivity boost is, in my mind unquestioned that it's going to be order of magnitude more valuable to us than simply the invention of the internet. Right, especially as extension of computers and the internet just kind of the new form of all that just to that, you know, order of magnitude or too higher. You know, it all comes down to the hardware. That's where the actual investments in bubble, all the data centers, all the chips, all the ram, all the trillions of dollars being poured into that. Will people get a return on investment or not? Maybe not if you've got a bunch of bankruptcies or whatever. But the overall envelope of knowledge and just improvements to AI overall will continue on one way or another. It's getting pushed along. I guess I just heard. I just saw an article tonight. It's related to this, and we previously talked about Chinese black ops the United States funding people to come out and be anti data center in the United States. Finally, I saw an article I think on the Drudge Report tonight. I didn't click it, I didn't read it, but it just says expert claims that, uh, space data centers are you know, a major risk for the planet. Like somebody came up with that. Now, right, when the. Whole when the whole idea is whatever minimal impact the data center has in whatever region it is in, right, you know, putting it in space ticks that away. Right, not in my backyard, not in your backyard, it's just in orbit. And now there's articles coming out against that, like people in Beijing are working overtime. By the way, since the last Patriot Power Our episode three point fifty four, Trump came out and made the announcements of declassifications of what exactly happened in the twenty twenty election. It's not rating on heat map dashboard because it's it has happened in the past. But let's just say, a lot of pieces of the puzzle have been filled out. Yeah, it happened just two hours after our last show ended. It seems like a long time ago, but only one week. On the other hand, not long at all. What would your take on that? You say, a lot. So there was people doing the right thing at every level of the intelligence agency, and they were all getting shut off from political appointed leaders above them number one, right, FBI on the ground, CIA on the ground, other intelligence agencies thought for what it was, so it was completely censored to the degree to which China was absolutely in, you know, stealing the vote. I don't want to say interfering with elections, right, because interfering with elections is a neat, little kind of gray zone. Right. So in my mind, if Russia has social media accounts that tell the truth about the Clintons, and more people know about the Clintons wrongdoings than they would have, that's to me First Amendment protected activity. And I don't care if the foreign government planned it. It's stalient and it's influential because it's fact based and it's true. But that gets swept up with reports again not confirm, but they're in the classified documents. Reports of China counterfeiting tens of thousands of ballots, counterfeitting you know, thousands of driver's licenses, shipping them in, handing them out, literally stealing the election. I've never I've never heard of Russia ever be accused of that. Most I ever heard of Russia doing is maybe attempting to hack these machines and the machines and what was done in Venezuela ahead of twenty twenty, the you know, the dry run, like we we got documentation of a workflow, a process. You're sitting there in the Chinese intelligence agencies. You sat there, you know, you know when Trump first got elected and the clock was on for four years, how can we steal it right? With a very willing domestic political party to help it happen. Right, Some let it happen on purpose, and some make it happen on purpose from the insiders inside the gates, right, the traders on the inside. Let let the barbarians through the gates. In that regard, I guess I was thinking the difference between election interference and theft if you know, it's just semnnics, I guess. But the main difference I was thinking is election interference it's more like propaganda, like trying to convince them, brainwash them, kind of mess with their media or overall, you know, dropping pamphlets back in the day, whereas theft, that's like street speech. Yeah, yes, but theft is more well, I guess this is I think that's more like a military war operation. But DestinE direct action. Exactly, that's way, way worse. For sure. Spionage, it's called espionage, running a server farm near Moscow to put out something that might influence somebody in another country. The powers that be in the countries, right, Obama and then Biden, they hate it. They hate it. But would it matter if Russians were putting out things that nobody believed. No, it's just speech, counterfeiting, IDs and ballots. And the top five states. The margin of victory in the top five states that Trump lost in twenty twenty but then went ahead one in twenty four Right, it includes Arizona, Nevada, Ohio, Georgia, one more escape Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania, And I think Arizona was slightly more than ten thousand vote margin for Biden, and Pennsylvania was eighty thousand. So there you go between ten and eighty thousand and five Swing States, and the Chinese intelligence can steal in action here. That's minuscule, Like that's such a small margin truly, So it's possible. It's like they have the motive for sure, and it's something they could possibly pull off, and it seemingly did pull off. It's not like, you know, something that's totally impossible and we're just kind of making something up that's not reasonable. It is reasonable that it. Was suspected in the CIA assessments. They listed that. You know, there's the complete strategy of you know, just pay American media to report negatively against Trump and fostered the BLM riots. By the way, right, I mentioned there's more there that's that hasn't been declassified. Where did the palettes of bricks that showed up on corners come from? And you know there's many tens of thousands of Chinese anchor babies that went back goudage kid brought through the intelligence schools and walk around here with the US citizenship. Anybody could have paid for those pallets. Right, That's what we're facing. That's what we're facing it And for all those out there that are crying about our deep state and our surveillance infrastructure and how it ain't like America in the fifties anymore. Look abroad, this serious fucking threat that we got to deal with. Yeah, I would have to agree. Well, I'm not sure exactly where to go from here. And the problem is. Once you build up that apparatus and the you know, the worker level, the executor, frontline level of these agencies in the intelligence community, once they get robust and funded and trained, if the wrong set of uh, you know, the wrong master in the White House arrives, they throw political appointees on top of that, and then they turn it against their political opposition. That's what's at risk of sitting there and letting Democrats be elected. Oh if they get back in, they're not They're gonna do everything they can not to lose. Grasp for sure. I mean it's kind of a miracle they they fumbled twenty twenty four. So with these revelations, with the facts behind them, so it's going to make a difference. Are any of these elections in these states and jurisdiction is going to be more fair because people are going to really be watching it. Like, as we've talked about in the past, what's already happened. It's already happened. We want people to come to justice, but more importantly is making sure it doesn't happen to go forward. So you think that's like, how have we won that battle? Are we losing that battle still? Are we trying to play catch up? Where are we at. If they can't get the save through on a budget related bill that could go to reconciliation and only pass both thousands with you know, fifty fifty votes right, or fifty votes in the Senate and half of the House right, you know, a majority vote. Then you've got to overcome the filibuster in the Senate, and that means getting certain Republicans that Trump primaried so they don't care, Billis and Cornyn right, and and a bunch of other Democrats to agree. So I looks like Senate's too closely matched right now to bring about that reform. It's going to be interesting to see what Trump can do to clamp down on this kind of you know, direct action espionage is still our elections. And of course what's always in play is you know, his his and his party's popularity too, right, So it's it becomes this great murky zone where you know, honestly, we're all just taking our best guess on on what was real and what wasn't. If if if he had to have some other revelations that could come out and reunify his base then and put an end you know, but ninety of that kind of cheating, you know, make it ninety percent of it impossible. Then, you know, might be a to talk about ai miracle. You know, a party that holds both thousands of Congress and the presidency winning, you know, retaining that power in the in the in Congress at a midterm, that would be historic, right, and I think Trump Party knew that. You know, Americans almost always blame whoever's in charge and vote against him in the you know, in the or at least the independence to that that ten percent margin that's not forty five sent one way or forty the other. That ten percent kind of just swings like a pendulum at the midterms against whichever party won the White House last. So it's a really tough order to come to hold the houses, which means after that, you know, nothing passes for the rest of his presidency. He might even get it peached again in the House, but it won't be a conviction in the Senate. So that's what we'll be looking at. And by the way, none of that it clear rates as dangerous and the he map dashboards. So for that two years of political trouble, if it comes to pass that way, we'll be talking about what really matters on this show because that that's the way that that's the way the system was designed, The founders designed it to be that way. Yep, that's what we'll have to focus on. The election theft, but the political ass you know, day to day politics and the parties and whatnot not as much one thing. I there's a lot of ways to combat this. I think one of the best, if not the best, that would work the best for Americans is seeing it for their own eyes. And I'm thinking of of a James O'Keeffe type of sting, but on a much larger scale, where well, let's just presume the midterms are going to be they're going to try to steal they be in China or whomever, are going to try to run some ops here in October. They're already got to be in country and preparing. It's only a few months until November, so we need some you know, double agent. We need our own people in there exposing this from the inside. Then a week or two before the election, drop all that out pure proof before the election, but of them actually tampering what's going on right now, like that could that could sway some minds right there? Who do you try to sway? Like who do you try to swing who's going to vote against Republicans until they hear that. This is more just for almost posterity or just to document this as much as anything too. And Trump certainly did last Thursday night. Five kind of categories that he brought out, and you know, like a metaphor we use or week or so ago was Now he's in a federal government where the first time around, every door got locked, every compartment, every tiny little attic of every agency, and he didn't know how to unlock them, and it worked against him. Right the deep state Now they know better, so they're stomping through every back attict trying to find what they can find. His best hope of swinging anybody is to bring out some real scandals, some all time you know, most influential October surprises. But there's still forty percent of the country that I don't think I don't think that anything he could say. They hate him too much. They're gonna vote against him. There's nothing would change their mind. Yeah, they won't even look at the facts, or they have most of them don't even care, but a lot of them all won't look at the facts either. Half of them will privately cheer it at the Chinese help beat him in twenty twenty. For sure, maybe more half. Unfortunately they're globalist and pretty much socialists that are not, you know, truly neo Marxist, right, like what maybe all for it the day might come with they'll openly say it. Democrats dismiss our constitutional traditions as nostalgia. One of the articles on future danger tonight, and actually it was a red level, which is the second highest. There's different quotes in here from whether it's Mom, Donnie or Kamala or other people of that ilk. Well, it all comes back to what I consider freedom, liberty, bill of rights versus well, authoritarianism, whether you want to call it, you know, communism, democratic socialism, or fascism or any of these other things. It's just totalitarianism, authoritarianism versus freedom and just the basic rights that God gave you and the government recognizes the government didn't give you those rights. They just recognize it and are just barred from encroaching upon those rights that you were given. So anyway, that's the real difference here future Dan to me. But these social democrats whatever, they're looking like total psychos. What's your outlook on them? Just just talking about the Constitution is anything other than the law of the land is dangerous. And we allow them to That's why we don't want censorship. They can say these things. Oh, it's First Amendment protect the speech, for sure, But there's many forms of First Amendment speak that could be dangerous. Right, the right to rebellion. Rebellion we got, by my last count somewhere near ten states mostly you know, the original thirteen Colony states that in the Constitution, you know, either directly, I think North Carolina is the most direct, but there was others that imply that the people can abolish their government whenever it gets to the point where it doesn't suit its needs. Right, that's in there. That And if you don't believe in that premise, then ask yourself, why is there a second Amendment really really to protect you from you know, somebody's showing up on your property. Now, that's not what people are concerned about. They're concerned about retaining holding the government at risk with the militia that could get rid of it if it became tyrannical. Right, perfectly protected free speech, but you can understand, depending on who's saying what I'm saying right now, it can also come off as a threat. All right, Well, let's just say I got been exercising my Second Amendment. But for every every boll that I put down range, I put out five hundred words on Patriot Power hours. So first Amendment is first for a reason, but second amendments there for a reason, Like you said, for a militia to not just protect itself against you know, outlaws or bad groups. But really it's the government. It's not you know, it's not for criminals per se. It's for the government, for tyrannical government. So at a let me see if I can say it verbatim, I'm not reading militia being necessary to a free state. The right to bear arms shall not be infringed. Pretty simple, right, it is. It is, And I think we're a long ways away or you know, there be any you know, physical threat of this, but you'd have to have the most democrat states openly change their public school primary Bibi's education too, you know, start indoctrinating that it's nostalgia that's not valid, that it has to be changed first, they even have to do it. Then you'd have to watch how big is the population of those states and how likely are they to essentially conductor revolt and and and just abandoned the constitution how you know. So you'd have thought that that was like lifetime's away, just a few, you know, ten years ago. But given what the left has talked itself into in a hive mind kind of manner what's legitimate and what's not, we you know, it might not be that far away before when that primary education Civics teaching falls in those states, then we'll know the troubles on its way. And it's definitely been degrading. This is where I feel like, if the welfare keeps flowing, there won't be such fervor and motivation in the street to have a revolution, let's say. But if the free stuff stops, it could become a crazy, violent mob that more French revolution than American revolution in that regard. But if the you know, snap benefits and housing and maybe a universal basic income down the road that'll placid enough. My hypothesis is just a hypothesis. It's just that the people that fall into socialism are just so goddamn lazy innately that they won't get off their asses to start a revolution unless they're starving that will force them into it their animal instinct. But most of them are so weak. But we should not underestimate them. I'm not saying that, but I do feel like they're more like Wally the Robot, or like, you know, more like not Wally the Robot, like you know, the they're just more like blobs. They're very dangerous, but they're not going to go start their own country. But they may just destroy a bunch of stuff if they don't get you know, their McDonald's snap cards. I'll tell you what thing. There's never gonna be a socialist regime overthrowing the US Constitution in my lifetime. Never, because it even began to happen, my lifetime would be on short order. While I'm putting an end to that. There you go, time stamp date stamp July twenty third, twenty twenty six. Right to the revolution. Don't forget it. It's a real thing. If you don't believe in it, you don't even believe in the founding of the country, like the revolt against the king wasn't even legitimate. If you don't understand, we the people can reset this anytime we need to. Well, part of me wants to say it's about time for a reset, but I don't know. I don't want to knock the game over because that may cause more problems. But eh, a refresh could could be good. Let's stick with the news for now, though future dan finish off strong. We've got about twenty minutes and we got a lot of articles still to hit anything you really really want to hit on, you know, so we don't miss it when we run out of time. Uh. We've talked about the epic fury earlier, and I think he asked me about ground invasion or speculating on whether that's you know, in the cards. It's got to be in the card. It's always in the cards. Every single bluff, every single leverage point against the Iranians, they're all being brought to bear. But if there was you know, putting ground troops probably marine corps into Yemen, so just for once in all, once and for all really, and the hooty problem because that they're cornered on that peninsula right their enemies in Saudi Arabia Iran can't project anything to them right now, right, But cleaning up the corner of the Arabian peninsula with ground troops, I would say it's possible. I bet you there's people advocating to the president. But you know, you remember he was a young man and he didn't go to Vietnam. And I guarantee you he and his family and eleits in New York that he surround him with, you know, weren't in agreement with Vietnam. Thought it was a waste of life, didn't have respect for that fight, right, And he's he's shaped by what he saw growing up. It's clear to me, right seventy nine revolution Reagan. You know, you know all that he's been paying attention the whole time. He always wanted to be president, so of course he's paying attention. So I got to believe he wouldn't gamble with ground troops in any large numbers. And I'm not sure Maduro. You know raid, you know a j sodif raid, you know by commandos that won't make any difference against a Huti's right. And by the way, the iceberg I was talking about before, underneath that iceberg, there's probably direct action, you know, special operations going on constantly right now. Yeah, yeah, and there's h I remember growing up when I was probably about ten years old, you know, ten to twelve years old, so about five to six years after the First Golf War, and a few years before nine to eleven, it seemed like, oh, hopefully we're not gonna have it really any wars with you know, Coastovode stuff like that was going on a little bit. But I guess I don't know, it's kind of maybe not the right thing to say, but anyone who was into special forces at that point, they didn't get much action compared to the guys these days, like every single seal and Special Forces guys probably just like getting so much action is crazy, like enough to go around fifty times over there has to be right now. Definitely on the ships, they're doing ship hops in the Persian Golf so they're at they got that massive. But yeah, since September eleven, it's been completely different in that regard. Previously, you know, you had what after Vietnam, you had Grenada, god forbid, Lebanon where an Iranian militia blew up the marine barracks. But then Grenada, Panama First Goal War and Somalia, right, I mean, you know what do want of combat veterans in the force now, it's yeah, we've been very very significant level of war. I think that's why it's got a lot of older people, a lot very stressed out about this. But then you know what we've seen in you know, in Ukraine and Russia is in fact there's still a balance of power. The nuclear umbrellas keep keep it all in place, and there can be you know, mid intensity conventional warfare in certain places and it doesn't necessarily mean things are spiraling out of control. Well, they are spiraling out of control for you know, the people of Ukraine, definitely the people of Iran right now when you when you're losing a ward, spiraling out of control. But you know, the global structure power structures seems pretty solid right now. Russia suspected of helping Iran target CIA sites in the Gulf. There's also, uh we've talked about the I s R. Right in Ukraine, how US NATO was helping in that regard, But it seems like China and China Russia might be helping Iran with some targeting or some intelligence information whatever, without doubt. Why wouldn't they to be expected. Do you think it's more of China or more Russia or both of them doing as much as they can? Pretty much? Oh, both of them are doing as much as they can. Well, the best outcome of this epic fury for both of them. Is us losing for them, right, Yeah, Well, you know, we've actually hit almost every article in detail. Let me see if I can find a couple more. But I got one that didn't make it on the into the Blitz Creek, and I was I was waiting actually to see if you were gonna attempt to read the name of the Japanese volcano going off. But you definitely maneuvered beyond that word. But would take a breath, take a look at it. I know you can do it. Japanese is actually relatively easy to pronounce. I've found, that's true. Totally filtered that out and just skipped over it and just said instead, yeah, there's some volcanic activity. All right, I'm gonna go with. Talk at you key, okay, that I've never heard of that volcano apparently hasn't gone off for a long time, but yeah, ring a fire, just one more, one more mountaintop smoking in Japan. I'm gonna I don't think I could pipe the audio in. I would otherwise and have like Google read it aloud to see if I pronounced it correctly. I will search that. On the other end, I gotta be honest, like a head of our weekly Patriot Power Hour as I go through and find the news and the the earthquake, weather, uh, volcano. I mean that stuff comes from the watchers dot com. It's just a go to site, super reliable, perfectly factual articles, never paywall blocked, highly recommend that website. It's the mainstay of Future Dangerous News and column four. And when I when I catch one like that, I'm like, oh, yeah, here's a volcano going off. How how much trouble's been gonna have pronounced this one. There's a lot of tough ones. I've tried to pronounce a few of them. Some of them I do skip, though, so feel free to call me out if I don't. If I'm not so slick that you catch on, I'm trying to get the pronunciation, but talk I think now, turning. Our attention back to economics, I got a different frame that I invite you to look through. Okay, two summers ago with the sources reporting the grade one topical relatively less dangerous but still needs to be on the heat map, that kind of economic news. But they have ever reported the same stuff under Biden. I think the answer is now. You mean, not the art necessarily the articles that are here right now, but just generally, would they point out problems with foreclosures or problems with interest rates and energy prices. I guess what I'm trying to say is that the problems that are behind those articles I checked. I'm like, these don't even rate as grade you know, yellow grade four instead of five. It's yeah, the marginal, whether you know. Let me let me ask you this. The thirty year treasury note is that the one that moved four basis points today. Let's go see it has the article from the dashboard with the exact uh. Yes, it is exactly the ten It's a ten year, ten year treasure yield, not the thirty year, but might as you know, similar, And just. To help people out, what's what's the basis point and what is a movement of four of them in a single day mean, and how is it dangerous? Is that? Or or if this has been a news under Biden? What we have never seen the headline because it's almost trivial. I do think this is important, but I can see them trying to rub it into Trump's face more so it gets more prominence, but it would still be reported on just I could see it more neutral. A basis point is it's the most precise way to describe a decimal within an interest rate. So let's pretend you're interest rate is five point zero zero percent. That's actually five hundred basis points. So if if your interest rate went from exactly five percent to five point one percent, it would go from five hundred basis points to five hundred and ten basis points. So four basis points isn't that big. However, the thing is there's trillions and trillions and trillions of debt on top of this. So going from four point six seven percent that's the actual number. It went from four point six seven to four point seven to one, that's not that much. But when you apply that to trillions upon trillions of dollars directly, and then tens of trillion dollars indirectly through the all the global bond market because it's the reserve currency. So it's you know, you got the cannonball splash, but then you got the ripple effects all the way across the lake. It's more like a tsunami. Yeah, I got So the basis point's one, exactly and exactly how many basis points could a ten year treasury move a single day before like a like at closing this time of day you heard that news, and and and and some of your prepping plans go into effect because to your mind, things are breaking. Things have to have broken. If four won't break it in a day, what kind of swing would warrant a black on red in this indicator? Treasury rates surge, That's what I'm really trying to get at. And right while you're thinking about that, can you open the archive because I'm not sure I ever took it to grade one happening now a true surge, like a true dangerous surge. If it happened it was during the spring of twenty with COVID. It was happened sum in twenty three, but then they lowered rates and so that stopped that craziness but that was the overall interest rate being above five percent, So we were just talking about four point seven three. But back in twenty twenty three, the interest rates was above five percent, but they were able to bring it down. The thing is now it's going right back to where it was, but at a very fast rate. You know, they still have twenty thirty forty basis points to go, so you could have ten days of what happened today occur before we got to where we were. But you know what, stop barrow? Will it rocket? Pass up? Hang on, hang on? Wherever the actual ten year yield is. Let's set that side for a minute, right, what about a one day surgeon basis points for you know, what if what if it wasn't for today? What if it is you know, ten or forty like something anomalous like that, Like you're saying, well, something snapped and so many other things are going to break from that it can't be stopped. Now, what what is that? What is that basis point movement that would freak you out? Uh? Ten basis points? Really? So we're forty percent of the way there today. That's pretty good perspective right there. Ben That that's the stuff that I'm I'm not fooling around right now. I'm I'm seriously trying to figure out how should I actually run this indicator on future danger that if ten basis points or a tenth of a percent in one day in those rates, it tells you something that could be breaking, then, folks, that's what That's how you find early warning signs. Right there, I think so. Uh, I'm not sure if this analogy matches perfectly, but I kind of think of it as your heart rate. Let's just say you're resting heart rates eighty and sometimes it can get load to fifty or sixty. Sometimes you can get up to one hundred. Yeah, if you swing between sixty to one hundred, like if you go too fast, it could be dangerous, but you're still within the bounds. You can also think of it as like the RPMs in your car, Like if you go between two to four thousand, you're probably cool, but if you go from two to four super fast, that's dangerous. And if you're overshoot and then you hit five thousand and six thousand redline and blow out before even though it hits you, it's the momentum effect as much as anything. I'm doing a quick I don't know how quick this reason which will be I'm trying to find the top ten moves, daily moves, and the ten year treasury in the last decade to see if I can answer that, to see if it hasn't even moved ten basis points in one day. Probably not, because that's a huge move. But you're asking what would be SHTF, like, oh my god, I'm gonna go empty the ATM if I can. I'm gonna go do whatever I can. I just it's kind of a round number, of course, but I've been ten basis points is a good one. Last chance on the bitcoin train because that stick the handles pulling out of the station. Right, well, man, bitcoin is I don't know if that, I don't know what would happen if if interest rates blow out, it could be bad for bitcoin until or unless the dollar collapses, because if the interest rates go so high, then that really risks the dollar status and that either will lead to emergency rate cuts. Or and it's a it's a risk of dollar status matter. I don't see any currencies there clubs like, do we really want to talk about the bricks forming its own currency anymore? Right? That's you know, no. Big point, Bitcoin, golden silver can absorb tens of trillions of dollars out of the US dollar, right. But they'll just ignore that, and whichever currency is still the strongest is the reserve and it'll be US, right. Yeah, but bitcoin, gold and silver have a seat at the table. So hopefully the people of the US have at least bought some of that real money because the government I ain't trusting them to have much. That's why I said the bigcoin train money. It might not be moving out of stable or the station on the same day that there's a ten point basis point move, but she's getting ready, right righta people lie away from Fiat. It'll be a flight from Fiat. But you might get some nice deals on bitcoins. Still, if that happens all of a sudden, you might see Bitcoin dropping even further temporarily until until it goes crazy. That's what I'm saying. That's what I'm saying. Having some liquidity to be able to exploit some of those situations might it might be worthwhile. And then again, if the entire grid's going down a week later, then you're sinking wealth into a digital asset that could be could be a while before you see it again. Yep. And so I get a layer of your preps and diversify and you know, food, water, medical skills, health, ammo land. I'd go for all those things too. My research on chat GPT is not working fast enough. By the way, you've talked about wanting to buy some land. Are you missing a window right now? Well, you just gonna wait till there's foreclosures anyways. Yeah, I've already missed the window, and I kept waiting for it to come back in the last ten years, and it's not so at this point. I guess it's the sunk costs to think that way as well. But yeah, either I'll never be a landowner or I'm gonna buy it on you know, twenty cents on the dollar during the collapse. I don't think there's going to be either in between. You can find a bargain, yeah, work at them. You have to bigger, major lifestyle change to get a bargain, right, you might not. We have to move somewhere, right that. It's a good point. Can you still stay claims in Alaska? Just go out there and camp somewhere until they recognize you own it. I didn't watch the YouTube channel. It's kind of like somewhere as someone saying, I saw the headline, but I didn't read the article. I didn't watch the YouTube channel, but all the headline of the YouTube channel, and it said I staked the claim in Nevada, I think, and they were they like the preview played for like ten seconds, is like I got five hundred dollars worth the silver that the US government, you know, recognizes as mine because I claimed this random mountain side in Nevada. So apparently like that still happens. But I don't know how. I wasn't. I wasn't literally making mistake to claim on on on on mine. But that's interesting. That's that's pretty cool if you could do it. But uh, I meant, just like, go and find a patch of woods up and near the t live there. You know, I'm National forests, I guess, because it's either gonna be someone's private land or the public land. Probably better to do it on public land, but I don't know, probably like unowned land. Really, I would. Probably benefit from an Alaska listener floing US in on it. Even that. All comes down to who's going to remove you from that land? If nobody then you it's yours the squatter's creed, right. Yeah, but is there still land that's like theorecally owned by the county up there, but not you know, not not national land. But then again, you got you got a lot of agreements with with Alaska Native so it's probably not like that as much anymore. But yeah, I think I think up until the eighties and nineties you could do it. You know, the perfect resource for this would be it would be a former was he a state trooper or sheriff? I forgot, mister Dave Jones, Alaska state trooper. I believe you'd live there. He should, he should know that he should. All right, that's your trivia question. I know he said you'd be listening, sir, please on your next daily Auto Cash gives the answer here. And I have another question for Dave Jones. I'm getting pictures in the back channel of dead rabbits and I'm getting told that they are coyote bait because it's also pictures of coyote in his vicinity. Yeah, and I'm wondering, like what happened to the rabbits, Like, weren't they meant for food? I thought you're not you're not literally breeding them just to get a shot at predators. No, probably at night with lasers for you know, the obvious skill training that brings. I asked him what he did with the pelts of the rabbits, and I think he uses the pelts this, you know, probably the entrails and stuff. Has the bait. I presume they they are very efficient with you know, the Jones stead so they would not put a whole rabbit out there, I could promise you the war did would not allow that, right. Right, Yeah. Check out the backchannel one day there's just a bunch of dead white rabbits lined up. I'm like, oh, yeah, super fluffy and white. They were super fluffy and white. And I was like, oh, what what do you do with the pelts? And he said it's coyote bait. And I'm like, oh, all right, there you go. That's the Jones said, no wasted bits. Rog to that episode three five five, we're talking through summer season of Patriot Power Hour a little bit delayed to night started about how you know, it could be the latest we've ever broadcast in the in the work week, though PM on Thursday night Eastern Time usually aim for six but might be on other days. You got plans to be on other days, we should might as well share that with the audience. I like it. Let's do that. We used to do Thursday at eight pm, but that was long ago. I mean, that was gotta be that might've been pre COVID. Maybe even that was probably pre COVID because we came in on Tuesdays. I know. I at least it used to do Thursday nights seven or eight, I think. But anyway, long story short, we have not done Thursday at seven. We have been fairly consistent hit Thursday nights. We occasionally will go to Wednesdays. But for the let's just plan out the next few weeks. I fully expect us to be live next Thursday, the thirtieth, looking for that, looking forward to that. The next week I will be out of my normal position. We still might be able to put on a show, but I might have to. I'm gonna do my best come up with alternative microphone arrangements and stuff because I'll be on the road, so to speak. So I still really want to have a show on August sixth, and then really, I don't know, I feel like, at least from what I see now except for August sixth, which is, you know, pending my technical difficulties. I think pretty much every other week from now till at least Labor Day, or you know, the week right before Labor Day. So the next four or five weeks. Yeah, I don't see many conflicts. I think we're going to hit it hard in August. Yeah, it should be able to run the table right into September. As a matter of fact, we'll see if they are peaceful dog days of summer with low levels of news, and gives us an opportunity to pitch a power to explore other things, more bigger, broader picture than dwelling in the heat map dashboard. But I would say that, you know, I think it's true and it and it begs a you know, it invites a bigger question, right of how equal is the heat map dashboard or any frame with which to monitor the news. And what I mean is when we broadcast late in the week, late Thursday nights, there's so much more news available. It's pretty much true that the journalists go to work Monday morning and they got stories ready by Thursday. You know, for a lot of this, a lot of these headlines took time to prepare. They weren't like the Treasury rate moved for basis points today. A lot of this is today like it happened now, obviously, but some of this is like articles that had to be prepared. So what that means is the later in the week that we have our show tends to be the more we're reacting to fresh events. The earlier week, especially Tuesdays, tends to be reaction to the week before or whatever happened on the weekend. And the best example I can give you of that is the FED meetings, right and the reaction to them, like like we went for a long period of time, always on the eve of the FED and reacting to it the next week, whereas a Thursday schedule means we get to hear what was said and watch what happens afterwards for like a day and then talk about it on Thursday. So this pendulum is gonna swing. But in this timeframe for patriot power, are in our correct me if I'm wrong, eighth year, ninth year, with multiple seasons under our belt, we're more into the hot pake business than you know. Simmer on it for five to six days and react to. It mode yeah, this strikes the best balance. It really does. You know, I've done almost every day of the week show. Sunday night was a whole different experience than Thursday night as an example, and yeah, even the differ between Tuesday and Thursday could be crazy. I would I honestly think Friday during the day possibly would be the best day for a summary type of show. But first off, I'm usually a little out of it Friday, but I also want some of the live action, and by you know, Thursday, there's still a lot going on Thursday, so we get a fair amount of fresh news. But also, like you said, the seventy two ninety six hour window that's been breaking since you know, Sunday into Monday and permeating throughout the news cycle there and a. Lot of people trying to influence the news will drop it like Trump did later last Thursday night, trying to drop you know, break news that carries over in the weekend and has a greater impact. I'm not saying we have to do this, but at some point we might want to consider doing two shows a week. I don't know it would change things in a good way, but yeah, you know, people might get sick of this, but keep it on the back burner like like we like if the equivalent of COVID happened again. Now, I think we would definitely need to do two shows a week, that's all. Yeah, If we ever go pict your power are doubling up in a week, it's dangerous time because that we would have to be talking about developments that transpired, you know, between four and two days, you know, apart to be talking about new stuff. Right, we don't need to come on twice a week and rehash what we talked about on Tuesday. But if we get to that point, you know that, you know that that would be crisis conditions, and so on one hand, I don't want to ever have to do that, But on the other hand, if we if we have to do it, I'm all for it. Come on Saturday, Saturday or Sunday night, have a comedy hour instead of covering the news. That'd be fun, But we're not going to be doing that. It's all right. Debates the definition of a rainforest does do have salamanders or not? We were actually doing that in the pre show, and we're pretty confident neither of us knew the definition of a rainforest. So we we could do that all night. I guess Trump orders review related to climate guidance for federal judges. What is a temperate appellation forest? Is it a rainforest? Is it not? What about up in Colorado that's definitely not a rainforest? But what does that qualify as that? And more? Maybe on the next episode of Patriot Power Hour. It's been a great show, Future Dan. We're actually coming back one more show before July, so it's gonna I think it's gonna be uh yeah, six or seven weeks between here and Labor Day. I don't think it'll be dold drums will always have a great show, but I think it could be action packed. So I'll catch you next week, how about it. Yeah, God, bless the USA, God bless our artist. Thank you for listening, and thank you Ben for Sparents some time to get into the details with me. I do enjoy it, Yes, sir, me too. Three hundred and fifty five down, three hundred and fifty six next week. Catch you all later.